Criminal Appeal and Cross-Appeal on Statutory Interpretation
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe appellate court reviewed a case where the defendant appealed a prior ruling, and the prosecution cross-appealed, concerning a criminal matter. The court's reasoning focused on applying relevant statutory provisions to the established facts to determine the validity of the original conviction and sentence, ultimately affirming or modifying the lower court's judgment based on its interpretation of the law and the evidence presented during the proceedings.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertCriminal Appeal and Cross-Appeal on Statutory Interpretation: The court's reasoning focused on applying relevant statutory provisions to the established facts to determine the validity of the original conviction and sentence, ultimately affirming or modifying the lower court's judgment based on its interpretation of the law and the evidence presented during the proceedings.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n Urteil vom 24. September 2018 \n STK 2016 22 \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichter lic. iur. Walter Züger, Pius Schuler, Bettina Krienbühl und Clara Betschart, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Antoinette Hürlimann. |\n
\n\n
\n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter, Berufungsführer und Anschlussberufungsgegner, erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, 8836 Bennau, \n Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, \n vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, |\n
\n\n
\n