Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2016 7 • VG SZ III 2016 7 KI-generiert

Appeal Regarding Modification of Child Custody

Geschäftsnummer III 2016 7
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerns an appeal against a decision that modified custody arrangements, which was upheld by a subsequent authority. The appellant challenged the lower court's decision regarding the change in custody, which favored the other parent. The court reasoned that the modification of custody was justified because the previous arrangement was no longer in the best interest of the child, evidenced by a review of the current circumstances and expert evaluations, thereby upholding the decisions of the prior instances.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 93 Abs. 1 lit. b BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Regarding Modification of Child Custody: The appellant challenged the lower court's decision regarding the change in custody, which favored the other parent. The court reasoned that the modification of custody was justified because the previous arrangement was no longer in the best interest of the child, evidenced by a review of the current circumstances and expert evaluations, thereby upholding the decisions of the prior instances.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Abänderung der elterlichen Sorge Kindeswohl Praxisänderung begründeter Entscheid Anfechtbarkeit des Rückweisungsentscheids Anfechtung der Vermutung der Vaterschaft Sozialhilfe | java.util.HashMap/1797211028

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 93 Abs. 1 lit. b BGG
Used to declare the appeal inadmissible because it concerned a non-final decision regarding the appointment of a guardian.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
Used to impose court costs on the appellant because the appeal was dismissed.
KI-generiert
III 2021 40
Custody Modification Appeal Dismissed Based on Child's Best Interests
ZK1 2022 10
Custody Modification Due to Severe Parental Conflict
III 2019 142
Appeal Regarding Child Custody Arrangement Upheld
ZK2 2024 78
Appeal Regarding Modification of Child Support and Visitation
ZK1 2016 45
Appeal Regarding Modification of Divorce Decree Visitation and Child Support

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 93 Abs. 1 lit. b BGG

Used to declare the appeal inadmissible because it concerned a non-final decision regarding the appointment of a guardian.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

Used to impose court costs on the appellant because the appeal was dismissed.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2016 7 III 2016 21 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. April 2016 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis und Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterinnen |\n \n|\n |\n M.A. HSG Sandra Gehrig, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, c/o B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur., |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. D.________, \n Vorinstanz I, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n C.________ 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz II, \n3. B.________, \n Beigeladene (I), \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin MLaw E.________, \n4. Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) … \n Beigeladene (II), \n |\n

\n\n

\n