Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
III 2016 11 • VG SZ III 2016 11 KI-generiert

Agricultural Permit Revocation Upheld Due to Untimely Land Conversion

Geschäftsnummer III 2016 11
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerns a challenge to a decision by an agricultural authority which revoked a prior permit allowing the conversion of agricultural land for non-agricultural use, based on the petitioner's failure to complete the conversion work within the stipulated two-year deadline and the perceived lack of justification for the delay. The court upheld the revocation, reasoning that the authority acted within its discretion by strictly applying the statutory time limit for the conversion, as the applicant failed to demonstrate that the delay was unavoidable or justified by circumstances beyond their control, thereby adhering to the principle that regulatory permissions requiring specific actions within a timeframe are subject to strict compliance.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Agricultural Permit Revocation Upheld Due to Untimely Land Conversion: The court upheld the revocation, reasoning that the authority acted within its discretion by strictly applying the statutory time limit for the conversion, as the applicant failed to demonstrate that the delay was unavoidable or justified by circumstances beyond their control, thereby adhering to the principle that regulatory permissions requiring specific actions within a timeframe are subject to strict compliance.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Bewilligungsentzug landwirtschaftliche Nutzung Einhaltung der Fristen Bodenrecht gesetzliche Frist Arbeitsbewilligungen
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2016 11 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 28. Juli 2016 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Severin Ganz, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ AG, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n 1. Amt für Landwirtschaft, , 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n