Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2014 11 • VG SZ III 2014 11 KI-generiert

Property Owners Challenge Municipal Speed Bump Installation

Geschäftsnummer III 2014 11
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A group of property owners challenged a municipal decision that approved the installation of a new traffic calming measure, specifically speed bumps, on a public road passing through their properties, arguing that the measure violated their rights to property and a reasonable building permit process due to alleged procedural flaws and a lack of proper necessity. The court upheld the lower instances' decisions, reasoning that the administrative body had a proper legal basis for implementing traffic calming measures to ensure road safety, the measure was proportionate to the safety concerns, and the planning and decision-making process, including consultation, met the required procedural standards, thus rejecting the appeal.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Property Owners Challenge Municipal Speed Bump Installation: The court upheld the lower instances' decisions, reasoning that the administrative body had a proper legal basis for implementing traffic calming measures to ensure road safety, the measure was proportionate to the safety concerns, and the planning and decision-making process, including consultation, met the required procedural standards, thus rejecting the appeal.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Verkehrssicherheitsbedenken kommunale Baubewilligung Immobilienbesitz Eigentumsrecht Planungsmassnahme Anfechtung von Verwaltungsverfügungen Planungs- und Baurecht (nachträgliche Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The provision was cited to allocate the judicial costs for the federal administrative court proceedings.
KI-generiert
III 2021 32
Owners v. Municipal Council (Rezoning Initiative Admissibility)
III 2018 99
Property Owners v. Municipal Council (Construction Permit Challenge)
III 2025 131
Owner v. Municipality on Building Permit Denial
III 2023 196
Property Owners' Access Rights Over Private Road Upheld
III 2019 54
Property Owner v. Municipality on Road Improvement Levy Proportionality

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision was cited to allocate the judicial costs for the federal administrative court proceedings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2014 11 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. Mai 2014 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Josef Hensler, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis und Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterinnen |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________ \n2. B.________ \n3. C.________ \n Beschwerdeführer, \n alle vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin Dr.iur. H., |\n

\n|\n |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Lachen, Alter Schulhausplatz 1, Postfach 263, 8853 Lachen, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. F.________ \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n