Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
II 2022 18 • VG SZ II 2022 18 KI-generiert

Foundation v. LLC: Contractual Penalty for Pension Information Failure

Geschäftsnummer II 2022 18
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A foundation providing flexible early retirement benefits in the main construction industry sued a limited liability company for a contractual penalty related to occupational pension obligations. The court was asked to decide on the enforceability of this penalty. The court reasoned that the contractual penalty clause stipulated for non-compliance with the obligation to provide information was legally valid, as the foundation had demonstrably suffered damage due to the delayed and incomplete submission of the required employment data by the company, thus upholding the imposition of the penalty.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Foundation v. LLC: Contractual Penalty for Pension Information Failure: The court was asked to decide on the enforceability of this penalty. The court reasoned that the contractual penalty clause stipulated for non-compliance with the obligation to provide information was legally valid, as the foundation had demonstrably suffered damage due to the delayed and incomplete submission of the required employment data by the company, thus upholding the imposition of the penalty.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Konventionalstrafe Personalvorsorgestiftung Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung vorzeitige Pensionierung Stiftung Bauunternehmen Berufliche Vorsorge (Konventionalstrafe) | Berufliche Vorsorge (ohne med. SV)
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 18 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 17. Mai 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n Stiftung für den flexiblen Altersrücktritt im Bauhauptgewerbe (FAR), Obstgartenstrasse 19, 8006 Zürich, \n Klägerin, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n A.________ GmbH, \n Beklagte, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Berufliche Vorsorge (Konventionalstrafe) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: