Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II 2022 16 • VG SZ II 2022 16 KI-generiert

Claimant v. Compensation Office: Waiver of Assets and Supplementary Benefits Eligibility

Geschäftsnummer II 2022 16
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A claimant sought supplementary benefits, which involved scrutiny over a prior waiver of assets, leading to a second instance appeal against the decision of the compensation office. The court upheld the decision, reasoning that the prior disposal of assets, undertaken without full awareness of the long-term financial implications, constituted a voluntary renunciation of assets that precluded the claimant from immediately qualifying for the supplementary benefits, as the underlying condition for receiving such aid—that the claimant has exhausted their own means—was not met due to the avoidable disposition.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BV; Claimant v. Compensation Office: Waiver of Assets and Supplementary Benefits Eligibility: The court upheld the decision, reasoning that the prior disposal of assets, undertaken without full awareness of the long-term financial implications, constituted a voluntary renunciation of assets that precluded the claimant from immediately qualifying for the supplementary benefits, as the underlying condition for receiving such aid—that the claimant has exhausted their own means—was not met due to the avoidable disposition.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Ergänzungsleistungen anrechenbares Vermögen Anspruchsvoraussetzung für Versicherungsleistungen voller Ersatz finanzielle Mittel Rückforderung von Leistungen

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BV
This provision was cited in the dispositive to order the appellant to pay the court costs.
KI-generiert
II 2018 35
Claimant v. Supplementary Benefits Decision on Asset Waiver
II 2016 76
Claimant v. Benefits Authority Regarding Asset Waiver
II 2020 86
Waiver of Assets for Supplementary Benefits
II 2018 24
Claimant v. Administrative Body re: Supplementary Benefits and Asset Waiver
II 2020 85
Claimant v. Authority Regarding Supplementary Benefits Eligibility Based on Unexhausted Assets

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BV

This provision was cited in the dispositive to order the appellant to pay the court costs.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 16 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. Februar 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht; 2. Rechtsgang \n im Verfahren II 2021 44) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: