Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II 2022 10 • VG SZ II 2022 10 KI-generiert

Unemployment Insurance Entitlement Cessation Due to Non-Compliance with Job Search Obligations

Geschäftsnummer II 2022 10
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

An individual appealed a decision by the labor office to cease unemployment insurance entitlement, where the core issue was whether the claimant had fulfilled their obligations while receiving benefits. The court reasoned that the claimant's failure to comply with instructions regarding job applications and subsequent failure to attend a required meeting constituted a breach of their duty to accept suitable employment and cooperate with the unemployment office, justifying the cessation of entitlement.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Unemployment Insurance Entitlement Cessation Due to Non-Compliance with Job Search Obligations: The court reasoned that the claimant's failure to comply with instructions regarding job applications and subsequent failure to attend a required meeting constituted a breach of their duty to accept suitable employment and cooperate with the unemployment office, justifying the cessation of entitlement.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Verletzung arbeitsvertraglicher Pflichten Leistungsanspruch Einstellung der Versicherungsleistungen Arbeitslosenversicherung Arbeitslosigkeit zumutbare Arbeit
KI-generiert
II 2018 40
Unemployment Benefits Termination for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2024 94
Unemployment Benefits Cessation Due to Insufficient Job Search Efforts
II 2020 48
Appeal of Unemployment Benefit Cessation
II 2021 76
Claimant v. Employment Office (Unemployment Benefits Dispute)
II 2023 90
Unemployment Benefits Cessation for Insufficient Pre-Claim Job Search Efforts

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 10 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. April 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Milena Pesic, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Einstellung in der Anspruchsberechtigung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: