Mandatory Health Insurance Obligation Upheld
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe appellant sought exemption from mandatory health insurance coverage under the relevant statute, which the lower instance denied, leading to the current appeal concerning the compulsory nature of health insurance. The court reasoned that since the appellant was residing and employed within the jurisdiction, the statutory requirement for mandatory health insurance applied, and thus, the conditions for exemption were not met, upholding the decision of the social security institution.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 66 Abs. 1 des Bundesgerichtsgesetzes (BGG; Mandatory Health Insurance Obligation Upheld: The court reasoned that since the appellant was residing and employed within the jurisdiction, the statutory requirement for mandatory health insurance applied, and thus, the conditions for exemption were not met, upholding the decision of the social security institution.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertThe court ordered the appellant to pay the court fees.
Volltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n II 2018 101 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 16. Januar 2019 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Darinka Balzarini, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Krankenversicherung (Befreiung vom KVG-Obligatorium) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: