# Arbitration Clause Enforceability

**Geschäftsnummer:** ATAS/321/2003
**Citation:** CJ GE ATAS/321/2003
**Gericht / Behörde:** Cour de Justice (Cour civile) (Chambre des assurances sociales)
**Entscheiddatum:** 2003-12-11
**Ausgang:** Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
**Canonical Legislator URL:** https://legislator.ch/de/sources/case/ch/ge/ATAS-321-2003/arbitration-clause-enforceability
**Official Source URL:** https://justice.ge.ch/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1956385?doc=
**Entscheidsuche Mirror:** https://entscheidsuche.ch/docs/GE_Gerichte/GE_CJ_014_A-1424-1996_2003-12-11.pdf

## Legislator-Zusammenfassung

The case concerns a dispute over the enforceability of a contractual arbitration clause, specifically whether the plaintiff knowingly and voluntarily waived the right to judicial determination by signing the agreement containing the clause. The court determined that the agreement clearly and unambiguously outlined the binding nature of arbitration, the relinquishment of the right to a jury trial, and the limited scope for judicial review, and there was no evidence of fraud, duress, or unconscionability in the execution of the contract, thus upholding the mandatory arbitration provision.

## Legislator-Regeste

Art. 65 al. 1 LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Arbitration Clause Enforceability: The court determined that the agreement clearly and unambiguously outlined the binding nature of arbitration, the relinquishment of the right to a jury trial, and the limited scope for judicial review, and there was no evidence of fraud, duress, or unconscionability in the execution of the contract, thus upholding the mandatory arbitration provision.

## Schlagwörter

Schiedsklausel · vollstreckbarer Entscheid · richterliche Feststellung von Rechten · Gültigkeit des Vertrages · Effektivklausel im Gesamtarbeitsvertrag · Schiedsspruchaufhebung

## Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

[Art. 65 al. 1 LTF](https://legislator.ch/de/sources/law/ch/federal/173.110/65) · [Art. 66 al. 1 LTF](https://legislator.ch/de/sources/law/ch/federal/173.110/66)

## Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

### 1. Art. 65 al. 1 LTF

The appeal is dismissed because it did not meet the requirements for the submission of the grounds for appeal, as ordered in the dispositive.

### 2. Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The appellant is ordered to pay the court fees.

## Volltext


     


   
 &'()(&'+ "
&,)'&)--,

."

! "/! #" 
 

!#
 
#/


 '- #  )--,

(0  #1 2

  

34444444444 
    !"#""  
 $ % &&  & &   '( #)  *" #"" 
 
 

 


5/# #" 
 #"/
  //
 
  # +, -./ 0123     4


       

       !"
#$ % 

5 16.5

  6  #*"" # 11 9 0778/  &:"   #; " !"" <"5=  & >?  ** @ ABBBBBBBBBB &  " # >C D2DC3- @ "  #  "' " * " , *  D0 #*' 077. E

   #*""  !" "  @   F #;G   #)  "   H:" #  "    * ) # **   "  "! # " #* " " @  "' " ;:"  * * #** E

; #*""   "= #  " " &6 6  "   , '  * *  "!"*  , I @  "* * E

    # 12  ' 0778/ ABBBBBBBBBB & /  ;" *#"" #  # "/    *  #*"" E

 #  *:" # 1- :' 0778/  & >  * )  )"!" " # " I " @  "' " # @ " "  " #  " " & E

 #=    #  *  !!" #*#" # " *:*  " "H  ; & E

  IH # 0D  122D/    *  !/  ""   #    "= #;5:""  :":   I *   " I *  ABBBBBBBBBB & E

#    )  " H:"  ;H" " I#"""  * * #"!"*   " # 0. :' 1221  ); "'   #  "  * * " " * #=  0 9 122D/     "  ")/        "  ": @  "      " !"" # 0  0778 <!C  " 0/  C   -8 / C 1/  C  ? E

  ; " D/ C D # #"" " " " #  " # 0. :' 1221/   " #"  : ; *  :"H #  " *" *  #  #:  ""   #    "= #; " !""  * * " #;!!"  "'   #  " E

  *  # "' # *  #=  * '"  IH # * " "H E

60.1.60778

5 D6.5

    * * " I *    " < " D3/ C 0  >? E

   !"( " #    # "*  # : " @  "' "   "= #; " !""/  #* "   #*"" "   H/  (* "! ) I#"""/ *     "= #; & E

   " I *   "= #; &  * * I *  IH # 0D  122D/    *  ! E

;" :" # *# # , ;H" #  "' " #; " !"" E

JJJ

60.1.60778

5 .6.5

 #
 "/
  "/! #" 
 

!#
 
#/





  7 

0C 
K"   E

 7

1C  I C

 H!!" L  *"#  L

M"#   4 

 "  

 " ! # * ,   "!"* (  " "" )N@ N!!" !*#* #  "   H!!

60.1.60778