B250/76
ECLI:AT:VFGH:1978:B250.1978
KI-generiert
Constitutional court dismisses complaint regarding the validity of a law on the protection of the state against foreign influence.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant's complaint challenging the constitutionality of the law protecting the state against foreign influence. The applicant argued that the law violated fundamental rights by granting excessive powers to the executive branch. The court rejected this claim, ruling that the legislative measure was a proportionate and necessary restriction justified by the specific security needs of the state.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 13 Abs. 1 B-VG; Art. 14 Abs. 1 B-VG: The legislature may enact laws restricting fundamental rights if such restrictions are necessary for the protection of the state against foreign influence and are proportionate to the aim pursued.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
protection of the state
foreign influence
fundamental rights restriction
proportionality principle
legislative competence
constitutional complaint
security measures
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArt. 13 Abs. 1 B-VG
Art. 14 Abs. 1 B-VG
Volltext
Siehe PDF-Dokument
Siehe PDF Dokument