Constitutional court dismissed complaint regarding invalidity of administrative act under Art. 138a and Art. 138b of the Constitution.

The Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant's complaint challenging the validity of an administrative act based on alleged violations of Articles 138a and 138b of the Constitution. The applicant argued that the act infringed upon specific constitutional rights, while the state contended the procedure was lawful and within statutory limits. The court found no sufficient evidence to prove a constitutional violation, thereby upholding the administrative decision.