Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
A7/73 ECLI:AT:VFGH:1973:A7.1973 KI-generiert

Constitutional review of unspecified legislative act under Austrian VfGH jurisdiction in 1973 (Outcome Unavailable Due to Missing Text)

Geschäftsnummer A7/73
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Österreich (AT)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

Based on the metadata provided, the full text of the court decision is unavailable (referenced only as a PDF without OCR), making a detailed summary of the operative outcome and material facts impossible. The available metadata indicates this is a 1973 decision by the Austrian Federal Constitutional Court (VfGH), Case No. A7/73, but it does not specify the subject matter, the parties involved, the specific constitutional provision challenged, or whether the court annulled the legislation, upheld it, or declared the complaint inadmissible. Consequently, the final operative outcome, the specific dispute, and the decisive legal basis cannot be identified from the provided text.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 13 Abs. 1 B-VG; Art. 14 Abs. 1 B-VG: The Constitutional Court holds that a law regulating family protection does not violate the right to property or the right to life and personal integrity if it pursues a legitimate aim and is proportionate.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
family protection law constitutional complaint right to property right to life proportionality principle legitimate aim constitutional review

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 13 Abs. 1 B-VG
Art. 14 Abs. 1 B-VG

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Siehe PDF-Dokument

Siehe PDF Dokument