Constitutional court dismissed complaint regarding invalidity of administrative act under Art. 138a and Art. 138b of the Constitution.

The Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant's complaint challenging the validity of an administrative act based on alleged violations of constitutional provisions. The applicant argued that the act infringed upon specific constitutional rights protected by Articles 138a and 138b, while the state contended the procedure was lawful. The court rejected the claim, finding no sufficient evidence to establish a constitutional violation in the challenged administrative decision.