Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep II DoR 406/2025 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2025:II.DOR.406.2025 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses review application as admissibility conditions under ZPP are not met.

Case Number VSRS Sklep II DoR 406/2025
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia dismissed the applicant's request for permission to file a review against the first-instance court's decision. The applicant, representing a ward placed in a social welfare facility, argued that the court should have limited the right to presence during evidence gathering and hearings without consent. The court rejected the request because the statutory conditions for admissibility under Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure were not satisfied.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure; Article 367c of the Code of Civil Procedure: A review application is inadmissible if the statutory conditions for its admissibility are not met.

Keywords

AI generated
Code of Civil Procedure review application admissibility conditions social welfare facility right to presence

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 367c of the Code of Civil Procedure
AI generated
VSL sklep I Cp 2211/2015
Appeal allowed; court remands case for new facility selection after finding procedural flaws in social care transfer.
VSL Sklep II Cp 491/2019
Appeal dismissed; court upheld facility capacity ratio test for involuntary psychiatric admission compliance.
VSC sklep Cp 688/2010
Appeal allowed; court must obtain facility opinion and explain why it rejects capacity due to overcrowding.
VSL Sklep I Cp 2536/2017
Appeal against social welfare court order for placement in protected ward dismissed due to procedural defects in initial application.
VSL Sklep II Cp 927/2019
Appeal allowed; first instance court dismissed request without direct contact or hearing, violating procedural rules.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Predlog se zavrne.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je sklenilo, da se nasprotna udeleženka za čas enega leta (do 19. 6. 2026) sprejme v varovani oddelek socialnovarstvenega zavoda.

2. Pritožbeno sodišče je odločalo o pritožbi pooblaščenca nasprotne udeleženke, jo zavrnilo in sklep sodišča prve stopnje potrdilo.

3. Pooblaščenec nasprotne udeleženke vlaga predlog za dopustitev revizije glede vprašanja, ali mora sodišče v postopku sprejema na varovani oddelek socialnovarstvenega zavoda brez privolitve v izreku sklepa omejiti pravico do prisotnosti pri izvajanju dokazov oziroma prisotnosti na naroku.

4. Predlog ni utemeljen.

5. Pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367. a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju ZPP) niso podani, zato je Vrhovno sodišče predlog zavrnilo (drugi odstavek 367. c člena ZPP).

6. Vrhovno sodišče je odločalo v senatu, navedenem v uvodu sklepa. Odločbo je sprejelo soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).