Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep II DoR 311/2025 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2025:II.DOR.311.2025 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal request because debtors failed to prove they are licensed lawyers.

Case Number VSRS Sklep II DoR 311/2025
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia dismissed the debtors' request for permission to file an appeal in an enforcement proceeding. The debtors submitted the request themselves without demonstrating that they held a valid legal qualification, which is mandatory for representing parties in extraordinary legal proceedings. Consequently, the court rejected the application under the relevant procedural rules requiring representation by a licensed attorney.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

86. člen ZPP; 367. člen ZPP: In proceedings with extraordinary legal remedies, a party may only perform legal acts through a licensed attorney unless the party or their legal representative has passed the state bar exam; failure to prove such qualification results in the dismissal of the request.

Keywords

AI generated
extraordinary legal remedies licensed attorney requirement state bar exam enforcement proceeding appeal legal representation rules

Cited Legislation

AI generated
86. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku
367. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku
AI generated
VSRS Sklep X DoR 159/2020-3
Supreme Court dismisses appeal permission request due to lack of valid power of attorney from legal representative.
Sklep II DoR 150/2012
Supreme Court dismisses appeal request for late filing due to lack of obvious mistake.
VSRS Sklep II DoR 122/2016
Slovenian Supreme Court allows return to prior state due to missed deadline caused by late free legal aid approval.
Sklep X Ips 229/2009
Supreme Court dismisses appeal as citizenship determination lacks monetary value and does not cause severe consequences.
Sklep X Ips 592/2007
Appeal dismissed because debt value under 20,000 EUR and no specific legal issue raised.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Predlog se zavrže.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Dolžnika vlagata predlog za dopustitev revizije v izvršilni zadevi In 14/2012 s pristopi 10. 1. 2025 in 14. 1. 2025.

2. V postopku z izrednimi pravnimi sredstvi lahko stranka opravlja pravdna dejanja samo po pooblaščencu, ki je odvetnik, razen če ima sama ali njen zakoniti zastopnik opravljen pravniški državni izpit (tretji in četrti odstavek 86. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku; v nadaljevanju ZPP). Dolžnika sta predlog vložila sama, ob tem pa nista zatrjevala ne izkazala, da imata opravljen pravniški državni izpit. Vrhovno sodišče je zato predlog zavrglo (367.č člen ZPP). Odločalo je v senatu, navedenem v uvodu odločbe. Odločitev je sprejelo soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).