Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep I R 127/2025 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2025:I.R.127.2025 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses transfer of jurisdiction proposal by presiding judge due to lack of standing.

Case Number VSRS Sklep I R 127/2025
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia dismissed a proposal for the transfer of jurisdiction submitted by the presiding judge of the District Court in Kranj. The court held that such a proposal under Article 67 of the Act on Civil Procedure must be filed by a party or the presiding judge acting as a deliberating judge, not the presiding judge generally. Consequently, the presiding judge lacked the legal standing to initiate the transfer, as doing so would infringe upon the independence of the deliberating judge.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 67 of the Act on Civil Procedure; A proposal for transfer of jurisdiction under Article 67 of the Act on Civil Procedure must be filed by a party or the presiding judge acting as a deliberating judge, and a presiding judge generally lacks standing to submit such a proposal.

Keywords

AI generated
transfer of jurisdiction presiding judge standing civil procedure law deliberating judge judicial independence ZPP Article 67 procedural capacity

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 67 of the Act on Civil Procedure (ZPP)

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I R 143/2024
Supreme Court dismisses President's transfer request but allows party's request due to impartiality concerns.
AI generated
Sklep I R 33/98
Supreme Court dismisses jurisdiction proposal; appellate court's ruling on asset division binds lower courts.
VSL sklep II Cp 521/2010
Appeal granted; bankruptcy-related payment dispute jurisdiction shifts to District Court under ZPP rules.
VSL sklep I Cp 777/2011
Court dismisses appeal confirming jurisdiction remains with original court if case started before 2010 reform.
VSL sklep R 164/2004
Slovenian court rules jurisdiction lies with the court where the remaining real estate is located after withdrawal.
Sklep I R 49/97
Supreme Court rejects transfer of case due to local director presence, citing insufficient grounds for delegation.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Predsednik sodišča ni legitimiran za vložitev predloga za prenos pristojnosti.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Predsednica Okrajnega sodišča v Kranju je v pravdni zadevi Okrajnega sodišča v Kranju podala predlog za prenos pristojnosti po 67. členu Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP).

2. Predlog ni dovoljen.

3. Vrhovno sodišče lahko na predlog stranke ali pristojnega sodišča določi drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, da postopa v zadevi, če je očitno, da se bo tako laže opravil postopek, ali če so za to drugi tehtni razlogi (67. člen ZPP).

4. Ne glede na to, ali predlog za prenos pristojnosti vloži stranka ali pristojno sodišče, gre pri predlagalnem aktu po 67. členu ZPP za akt v okviru pravdnega postopka in ne za akt sodne uprave. Ker je tako, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog predsednice sodišča, ki ga je ta podala pod številko Su 126/2025, zavrglo. Predsednik sodišča namreč v pravdnem postopku ni pristojen podajati predlogov po 67. členu ZPP, marveč ima tako pooblastilo zgolj razpravljajoči sodnik. Drugačna razlaga bi posegala v neodvisnost zakonitega sodnika. Predsednica Okrajnega sodišča v Kranju, ki ni obenem tudi razpravljajoča sodnica v tej zadevi, torej ni legitimirana za vložitev predloga po 67. členu ZPP. 1

1 Enako je Vrhovno sodišče RS odločilo tudi že v zadevi I R 143/2024 z dne 4. 9. 2024.