Legislator Case Law & Legislation
VSL Sklep Cst 80/2025 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2025:CST.80.2025 AI generated

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn by the creditor before the appellate court issued its decision.

Case Number VSL Sklep Cst 80/2025
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court ruled that the appeal was withdrawn before a final decision could be rendered. The creditor had lodged an appeal against the first-instance bankruptcy order, alleging procedural violations and factual errors, but subsequently withdrew the appeal via a formal application. The court dismissed the appeal because the withdrawal occurred prior to the issuance of the appellate judgment, rendering the appeal legally ineffective.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

ZPP 334. člen; ZFPPIPP 121. člen: An appeal is deemed withdrawn if the appellant submits a formal application for withdrawal before the appellate court issues its decision, resulting in the termination of the proceedings without a substantive ruling on the merits.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of appeal bankruptcy proceedings appellate court procedural termination creditor rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se, da je pritožba umaknjena.

[JEDRO]

Upnica je pritožbo umaknila pred izdajo odločbe pritožbenega sodišča, zato je pritožbeno sodišče s sklepom ugotovilo, da je pritožba umaknjena.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je z izpodbijanim sklepom začelo postopek osebnega stečaja nad dolžnico A. A., ..., B. in ugotovilo, da je bila dolžnica ob izdaji tega sklepa vpisana v Poslovni register Republike Slovenije kot podjetnik oziroma zasebnik s temi podatki: ..., A. A. s. p., ..., C., in za upraviteljico imenovalo D. D.

2. Upnica Republika Slovenija je proti sklepu pravočasno vložila pritožbo zaradi bistvene kršitve določb postopka in zmotne ugotovitve dejanskega stanja. Pritožbenemu sodišču je predlagala, da pritožbi ugodi, izpodbijani sklep razveljavi in zadevo vrne sodišču prve stopnje v nov postopek.

3. Upraviteljica je na pritožbo odgovorila.

4. Upnica je z vlogo z dne 25. 3. 2025 pritožbo umaknila.

5. Ker je upnica pritožbo umaknila pred izdajo odločbe pritožbenega sodišča, je pritožbeno sodišče sklenilo, kot je razvidno iz izreka tega sklepa (drugi odstavek 334. člena ZPP v zvezi s 366. členom ZPP, oba v zvezi s prvim odstavkom 121. člena ZFPPIPP).