Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep II DoR 174/2024 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2024:II.DOR.174.2024 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses review application as statutory conditions for review are not met under ZPP Art. 367a.

Case Number VSRS Sklep II DoR 174/2024
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia dismissed the applicant's request for permission to file a review against the second-instance court's decision. The applicant argued that the lower courts incorrectly rejected an evidence request and misapplied burden of proof rules regarding document authenticity. The court ruled that the statutory prerequisites for granting a review under Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure were not satisfied, leading to the rejection of the application.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure; Article 15 of the Enforcement and Security Act: A review application is inadmissible if the conditions for its admissibility under Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure are not met.

Keywords

AI generated
review application admissibility conditions Code of Civil Procedure evidence request burden of proof document authenticity second instance court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 15 of the Enforcement and Security Act
Article 367c of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 324 of the Code of Civil Procedure
AI generated
Sodba I Ips 420/2008
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on forged documents, ruling no administrative procedure needed for legal effect.
VSK sklep II Ip 965/2007
Appeal court voids first instance rejection of enforcement due to missing proof of debt transfer.
VSRS Sklep I Ips 42761/2016
Supreme Court dismisses request for protection of legality filed before criminal proceedings become legally final.
VSL sklep I Cp 1328/98
Appeal allowed; contract dispute remitted for new trial due to misapplied tort law instead of labor contract law.
VSL Sodba II Cpg 848/2018
Appeal partially allowed: execution costs reduced; recovery costs excluded from execution expenses per ZPreZP-1.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Predlog se zavrne.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Tožnik zahteva ugotovitev nedopustnosti izvršbe. Sodišče prve stopnje je zavrnilo tožbeni zahtevek. Sodišče druge stopnje je zavrnilo pritožbo in potrdilo sodbo sodišča prve stopnje. Sporno je, ali je pravilna odločitev glede zavrnitve dokaznega predloga po tožnikovem zaslišanju ter ali je bilo pravilno uporabljeno pravilo o dokaznem bremenu pri dokazovanju (ne)pristnosti listine.

2. Predlog za dopustitev revizije zoper odločitev sodišča druge stopnje vlaga tožnik. Predlaga dopustitev revizije zaradi odločitve o pravnih vprašanjih: 1) Ali je odločitev sodišč prve in druge stopnje o zavrnitvi dokaznega predloga po zaslišanju tožnika (po zaprošenem sodniku) pravilna? 2) Ali sta sodišči prve in druge stopnje pri presoji, ali je listina pristna, kršili pravila o dokaznem bremenu in druga pravila pravdnega postopka?

3. Predlog ni utemeljen.

4. Vrhovno sodišče je ugotovilo, da glede vprašanj v predlogu niso podani pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju ZPP), v zvezi s 15. členom Zakona o izvršbi in zavarovanju. Zato je predlog za dopustitev revizije zavrnilo (367.c člen ZPP).

5. Vrhovno sodišče je odločalo v senatu, navedenem v uvodu sklepa. Odločbo je sprejelo soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).