Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep II DoR 339/2024 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2024:II.DOR.339.2024 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses review application as legal issues do not meet statutory review admissibility conditions.

Case Number VSRS Sklep II DoR 339/2024
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia dismissed the opposing party's request to allow a review against the second-instance court's decision. The first-instance court ruled that the applicant remains the tenant of a non-profit dwelling while the former spouse must vacate, a decision upheld on appeal. The Supreme Court rejected the review request because the parties failed to demonstrate that the application of Article 110(2) of the Residential Act raised a question of law sufficient to meet the strict admissibility criteria under Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367a(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure; Article 42 of the Code of Non-Contentious Procedure: A review application is inadmissible if the question of law does not concern the correct application of law or interpretation of law in a way that affects the outcome of the case.

Keywords

AI generated
review admissibility Code of Civil Procedure residential tenancy non-profit dwelling vacating spouse legal question second instance

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 42 of the Code of Non-Contentious Procedure
Article 367c of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 110(2) of the Residential Act
AI generated
Sklep II Ips 130/96
Supreme Court allows eviction of minor children from rented home when mother emigrates, remanding case for new trial.
VSL sklep I Cp 390/2013
Appeal dismissed; tenant cannot acquire ownership by improving property or claiming bad faith in lease renewal.
VSL sklep II Cp 468/2014
Appeal allowed; tenant's usage fee payment not deemed lease offer; case remanded for proper fact-finding.
Sklep II Ips 646/95
Appeal dismissed because plaintiff failed to state property value in non-monetary claim, violating ZPP rules.
Sodba II Ips 927/94
Appeal dismissed; spouses selling jointly owned home cannot claim tenancy rights against bona fide buyers.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Predlog se zavrne.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Med udeležencema (bivšima zakoncema) poteka nepravdni postopek zaradi izselitve prejšnjega zakonca iz stanovanja. Sodišče prve stopnje je odločilo, da predlagateljica ostane najemnica neprofitnega stanovanja, medtem ko se mora nasprotni udeleženec iz stanovanja izseliti. Sodišče druge stopnje je zavrnilo pritožbo in potrdilo sklep sodišča prve stopnje.

2. Predlog za dopustitev revizije zoper odločitev sodišča druge stopnje vlaga nasprotni udeleženec. Predlaga dopustitev revizije zaradi odločitve o pravnem vprašanju, ali sta sodišči prve in druge stopnje pravilno uporabili drugi stavek drugega odstavka 110. člena Stanovanjskega zakonika?

3. Predlog ni utemeljen.

4. Vrhovno sodišče je ugotovilo, da glede vprašanj v predlogu niso podani pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju ZPP), v zvezi z 42. členom Zakona o nepravdnem postopku. Zato je predlog za dopustitev revizije zavrnilo (367.c člen ZPP).

5. Vrhovno sodišče je odločalo v senatu, navedenem v uvodu sklepa. Odločbo je sprejelo soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).