Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep II DoR 241/2022 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2022:II.DOR.241.2022 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal request due to lack of standing as non-lawyer without bar exam.

Case Number VSRS Sklep II DoR 241/2022
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request to permit a revision appeal. The opposing party filed a lay appeal against a final judgment, which the court treated as a request for revision permission. The applicant submitted the request personally without demonstrating possession of a legal bar exam, violating the requirement that only lawyers or exam-passing individuals may act in such proceedings. Consequently, the court dismissed the request for lack of procedural standing under the Code of Civil Procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

86. člen ZPP; 367. člen ZPP: A party lacking a legal bar exam cannot file a request for permission to appeal in extraordinary proceedings without a lawyer, rendering such a request inadmissible due to lack of procedural capacity.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural standing legal bar exam extraordinary remedies lawyer representation code of civil procedure admissibility of appeal procedural capacity

Cited Legislation

AI generated
86. člen ZPP
367. člen ZPP
AI generated
VSRS Sklep II DoR 161/2022
Supreme Court dismisses review permission request due to applicant's lack of legal standing and qualification.
Sklep II Ips 471/93
Supreme Court dismisses appeal against enforcement ruling, allowing only appeal against rejection of that appeal.
VSRS Sklep II DoR 49/2022
Supreme Court dismisses appeal request due to lack of legal representation by a licensed lawyer.
VSRS Sklep II DoR 72/2025
Supreme Court dismisses appeal permission request due to applicant's lack of legal practitioner qualification.
Sklep II Ips 388/2001
Supreme Court dismisses appeal against a non-terminating procedural inactivity ruling under 1977 Civil Procedure Code.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Predlog za dopustitev revizije je zaradi pomanjkanja postulacijske sposobnosti nedovoljen.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Nasprotni udeleženec A. A. je zoper pravnomočni sklep sodišča druge stopnje vložil laično pritožbo, ki jo je Vrhovno sodišče obravnavalo kot predlog za dopustitev revizije.

2. Vložitev predloga za dopustitev revizije je del postopka z izrednimi pravnimi sredstvi, v katerem lahko stranka opravlja pravdna dejanja samo po pooblaščencu, ki je odvetnik (tretji odstavek 86. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku, v nadaljevanju ZPP), sama pa le v primeru, če ima opravljen pravniški državni izpit (četrti odstavek 86. člena ZPP). V obravnavanem primeru je dolžnik predlog za dopustitev revizije vložil sam, pri čemer ni izkazal, da bi imel opravljen pravniški državni izpit. Vrhovno sodišče je zato njegov predlog na podlagi določbe 367.č člena ZPP zavrglo.

3. Vrhovno sodišče je odločalo v senatu, ki je naveden v uvodu odločbe. Odločitev je sprejelo soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).