Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep II DoR 281/2022 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2022:II.DOR.281.2022 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal permission request due to lack of standing for non-lawyer representative.

Case Number VSRS Sklep II DoR 281/2022
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the request to permit an appeal against a lower court decision. The legal representative filed the motion personally without demonstrating possession of a state bar exam, which is required for non-lawyer representatives in extraordinary legal proceedings. Consequently, the court ruled the request inadmissible because the representative lacked the necessary capacity to act independently in this specific procedural stage.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

86. člen ZPP; 367. člen ZPP: A non-lawyer legal representative may file an appeal permission request only if they hold a state bar exam; otherwise, the request is inadmissible due to lack of procedural capacity.

Keywords

AI generated
legal representative capacity state bar exam requirement extraordinary legal proceedings appeal permission request procedural standing ZPP article 86 ZPP article 367

Cited Legislation

AI generated
86. člen ZPP
367. člen ZPP
AI generated
UPRS Sodba III U 310/2018-10
Administrative court dismisses request for free legal aid when applicant lacks merit for appeal.
VSK sklep II Cpg 92/2005
Appeal dismissed; review against final enforcement decision prohibited by enforcement law. Review against final enforcement decision prohibited by enforcement law.
VSL sklep I Cp 1002/2010
Appeal dismissed; Supreme Court rejects review due to low value of disputed subject matter under ZPP. Review not allowed as value under 40,000 EUR. Appeal dismissed; Supreme Court rejects review due to low value of disputed subject matter under ZPP. Review not allowed as value under 40,000 EUR.
VSRS Sklep II DoR 378/2024
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when applicant lacks lawyer qualification or bar exam certificate under ZPP Art. 86.3.
UPRS Sodba III U 41/2019-6
Administrative court dismisses appeal; applicant failed to specify legal aid scope in request, making it incomplete.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Predlog za dopustitev revizije je zaradi pomanjkanja postulacijske sposobnosti nedovoljen.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Zakonita zastopnica udeleženke je vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije zoper odločbo Višjega sodišča v Kopru I Cp 206/2022 z dne 24. 5. 2022, v zvezi z odločbo Okrajnega sodišča na Ptuju Rz 331/2021 z dne 18. 2. 2022.

2. Predlog ni dovoljen.

3. Vložitev predloga za dopustitev revizije je del postopka z izrednimi pravnimi sredstvi, v katerem lahko stranka opravlja pravdna dejanja samo po pooblaščencu, ki je odvetnik (tretji odstavek 86. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku, v nadaljevanju ZPP), sama pa le v primeru, če ima opravljen pravniški državni izpit (četrti odstavek 86. člena ZPP). V obravnavanem primeru je zakonita zastopnica udeleženke predlog za dopustitev revizije vložila sama, pri čemer ni izkazala, da bi imela opravljen pravniški državni izpit. Vrhovno sodišče je zato njen predlog na podlagi določbe 367.č člena ZPP zavrglo.

4. Vrhovno sodišče je odločalo v senatu, ki je naveden v uvodu tega sklepa. Odločitev je sprejelo soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).