Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 41/2024 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2024:III.DOR.41.2024 AI generated

Supreme Court allows review regarding correct application of Article 241 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 41/2024
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted the review request specifically concerning the proper application of Article 241 of the Civil Procedure Act. The lower courts had ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to vacate business premises and pay usage fees, which the defendant appealed. The Court determined that the conditions for review were met under the first paragraph of Article 367.a of the Civil Procedure Act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367.a paragraph 1 of the Civil Procedure Act; Article 241 of the Civil Procedure Act: A review is permitted when the lower court's decision concerns the correct application of specific statutory provisions, provided the issue is significant for the legal system.

Keywords

AI generated
Civil Procedure Act review admissibility Article 241 application business premises eviction usage fee liability Supreme Court review legal error standard

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367.a paragraph 1 of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 241 of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 324 paragraph 7 of the Civil Procedure Act
AI generated
VSL sodba II Cp 4608/2008
Appeal allowed: Oral lease modification valid via realization despite lack of written form.
VSL Sodba in sklep I Cpg 99/2023
Appeal court confirms first-instance judgment on eviction but partially allows claimant's appeal regarding legal basis and costs.
Sodba III Ips 37/2011
Supreme Court dismisses appeal claiming denationalization process completion affects temporary usage rights under ZLPP.
VSL sodba II Cp 2959/2013
Appeal dismissed; landlord's right to terminate gratuitous use of property until revocation upheld.
VSL Sodba I Cpg 405/2023
Employer liability upheld; mere employee notification insufficient without direct supervision and safety measures.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja: Ali so bile v tej zadevi pravilno uporabljene določbe 241. člena ZPP?

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja: Ali so bile v tej zadevi pravilno uporabljene določbe 241. člena ZPP?

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je ugodilo tožbenemu zahtevku in razsodilo, da se mora tožena stranka v roku 15 dni izseliti iz poslovnih prostorov in jih proste oseb in stvari izročiti tožeči stranki (I. točka izreka), toženi stranki naložilo plačilo uporabnine v višini 5.600,00 EUR in mesečni znesek uporabnine v višini 800,00 EUR od 1. 9. 2020 do 7. 7. 2023 s pripadajočimi zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi (II. točka izreka) ter ji naložilo povrnitev pravdnih stroškov tožeče stranke (III. točka izreka).

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je zavrnilo pritožbo tožene stranke in izpodbijano sodbo potrdilo (I. točka izreka). Odločilo je, da tožena stranka sama nosi svoje stroške pritožbenega postopka in ji naložilo povrnitev stroškov odgovora na pritožbo tožeči stranki (II. točka izreka).

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje vlaga tožena stranka predlog za dopustitev revizije.

4. Vrhovno sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato v tem obsegu dopustilo.

5. Sklep je bil sprejet soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).