Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 50/2024 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2024:III.DOR.50.2024 AI generated

Supreme Court allows review regarding constitutional standards for court reasoning and right to legal remedy.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 50/2024
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted permission for a review of the second-instance judgment on specific constitutional grounds. The applicant challenged the lower courts' decisions on lease contract invalidity and damages, arguing they failed to meet the reasoning standards of Article 22 of the Constitution and the right to legal remedy under Article 25. The court decided to allow the review because the conditions for admissibility under the Code of Civil Procedure were satisfied for these specific constitutional questions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 22 of the Constitution; Article 25 of the Constitution: The Supreme Court may permit a review when the lower courts allegedly failed to provide sufficient reasoning for their decision, thereby potentially infringing upon the constitutional right to a reasoned judgment and the right to legal remedy.

Keywords

AI generated
constitutional review reasoned judgment legal remedy lease contract civil procedure code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 22 of the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia
Article 25 of the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia
Paragraph 1 of Article 367.a of the Code of Civil Procedure
Paragraph 7 of Article 324 of the Code of Civil Procedure
AI generated
VSK sodba I Cp 876/2003
Contract not voided for illegal construction deviation; impossibility of performance not established.
VSM sodba I Cpg 495/2016
Appeal dismissed; court cannot examine unproven immorality claims not raised in first instance.
VSL Sodba I Cp 1101/2021
Consumer loan contract with foreign currency deemed valid; court rejects consumer's claim of unfairness and invalidity.
VSM Sodba I Cpg 211/2023
Appeal dismissed; tenant's lease and mining contract established ownership rights without separate mining concession.
VSL Sodba I Cpg 228/2021
Appeal dismissed; sale and leaseback not voided as prohibited commission contract under SPZ s. 132.1.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja: Ali sta sodišči prve in druge stopnje zadostili standardu obrazložene sodne odločbe iz 22. člena Ustave RS in pravici do pravnega sredstva iz 25. člena Ustave RS?

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja: Ali sta sodišči prve in druge stopnje zadostili standardu obrazložene sodne odločbe iz 22. člena Ustave RS in pravici do pravnega sredstva iz 25. člena Ustave RS?

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je zavrnilo tožbeni zahtevek glede ugotovitve ničnosti najemne pogodbe z dne 24. 6. 2003 in najemne pogodbe z dne 1. 7. 2023 ter petih dodatkov k tej najemni pogodbi (I. točka izreka) in tožbeni zahtevek za plačilo 1.714.000,58 EUR z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi od dneva vložitve tožbe (II. točka izreka) ter tožeči stranki naložilo povrnitev pravdnih stroškov tožene stranke (III. točka izreka).

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je zavrnilo pritožbo tožeče stranke in izpodbijano sodbo v zvezi s sklepom o popravi potrdilo (I. točka izreka) in ji naložilo povrnitev stroškov pritožbenega postopka tožene stranke (II. točka izreka).

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje vlaga tožeča stranka predlog za dopustitev revizije.

4. Vrhovno sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato v tem obsegu dopustilo.

5. Sklep je bil sprejet soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).