Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep II DoR 532/2023 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2024:II.DOR.532.2023 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal request due to lack of lawyer qualification and missing proof of bar exam.

Case Number VSRS Sklep II DoR 532/2023
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia dismissed the appellant's request for permission to file an appeal against a final judgment. The appellant attempted to file the request personally without submitting proof of having passed the state bar exam, which is mandatory for non-lawyer representatives. The court ruled that without a qualified lawyer or proof of bar exam completion, the appellant lacks the procedural capacity to initiate this extraordinary legal remedy.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

86. člen ZPP; 367. člen ZPP: A party may file a request for permission to appeal a final judgment only through a qualified lawyer or a person who has passed the state bar exam; failure to provide proof of qualification results in the dismissal of the request.

Keywords

AI generated
request for permission to appeal state bar exam qualification procedural capacity final judgment appeal ZPP procedural law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
86. člen ZPP
367. člen ZPP
AI generated
VSRS Sklep II DoR 531/2023
Supreme Court dismisses appeal request due to lack of legal standing and failure to prove barista qualification.
VSRS Sklep II DoR 309/2015
Supreme Court dismisses appeal permission request due to late filing and lack of lawyer qualification proof.
VSL Sklep II Cp 41/2024
Appeal dismissed; review inadmissible due to lack of Supreme Court approval and unauthorized filing by non-lawyer.
VSL Sklep II Cp 1014/2019
Appeal dismissed; non-lawyer self-representation in Supreme Court review rejected under ZPP rules.
VSRS Sklep II DoR 148/2019
Supreme Court rejects review request due to lack of lawyer qualification and procedural bar in enforcement proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Predlog se zavrže.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Tožnik je zoper pravnomočno odločbo sodišča druge stopnje sam vložil predlog za dopustitev revizije, potrdila o opravljenem pravniškem državnem izpitu pa ni priložil.

2. Predlog ni dovoljen.

3. Pravnomočno sodno odločbo sodišča druge stopnje je mogoče izpodbijati le z izrednimi pravnimi sredstvi. V postopku z izrednimi pravnimi sredstvi pa lahko stranka opravlja pravdna dejanja samo po pooblaščencu, ki je odvetnik, razen če ima sama ali njen zakoniti zastopnik opravljen pravniški državni izpit (tretji in četrti odstavek 86. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku, v nadaljevanju ZPP). Predlagatelj predloga ni vložil po pooblaščencu, ki je odvetnik, temveč sam, pri čemer ni niti zatrjeval niti izkazal, da ima opravljen pravniški državni izpit. Za vložitev predloga zato nima postulacijske sposobnosti. Če predlogu za dopustitev revizije ni priložen dokaz o izpolnjevanju pogojev iz četrtega odstavka 86. člena ZPP, sodišče vlogo zavrže (367.č člen ZPP).

4. Vrhovno sodišče je odločalo v senatu, navedenem v uvodu sklepa. Odločbo je sprejelo soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).