Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 139/2023 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2024:III.DOR.139.2023 AI generated

Supreme Court allows review to determine if denying legal interest for a mortgage suit is permissible when the enforcement title already exists.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 139/2023
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted the petition for leave to appeal regarding the dismissal of a mortgage lawsuit due to lack of legal interest. The lower courts rejected the plaintiff's claim because an enforcement title already existed, ruling that the mortgage holder could not pursue the matter separately. The Court decided to allow the review to establish whether denying legal interest in such scenarios violates the principle of legal certainty.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) 367.a odst. 1; The Supreme Court may permit a review to determine if denying legal interest for a mortgage suit is permissible when an enforcement title already exists and the right holder cannot utilize it.

Keywords

AI generated
legal interest mortgage lawsuit enforcement title review of decision ZPP 367.a procedural economy legal certainty

Cited Legislation

AI generated
367.a odst. 1 ZPP
324. odst. 7 ZPP
AI generated
VSL Sklep II Cp 1831/2021
Court dismisses claim for payment outside bankruptcy, ruling assignment creates security interest enforceable only within bankruptcy proceedings.
VSL Sodba II Cp 1764/2023
Appeal dismissed; mortgage remains valid despite debtor's debt discharge in bankruptcy proceedings.
VSL sodba I Cp 1112/2015
Appeal dismissed; ownership established by long-term possession despite land registry entry errors. Court rejected claims of bad faith and lack of good faith. Possession determines ownership substance. Registry errors do not negate possession. Good faith required for acquisition. Possession established by long-term use. Registry errors do not negate possession. Good faith required for acquisition.
VSL Sklep I Ip 1060/2025
Appeal dismissed; mortgage statute of limitations requires land registry erasure, not automatic extinguishment.
VSL sodba II Cp 442/2013
Appeal court reversed first instance, ruling mortgage remains valid despite debtor company's bankruptcy and dissolution.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je dopustno odreči pravni interes imetniku hipoteke za vložitev hipotekarne tožbe z argumentom, da izvršilni naslov že obstaja, v primeru, da imetnik pravice slednje ne more uveljavljati preko izvršilnega naslova?

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je dopustno odreči pravni interes imetniku hipoteke za vložitev hipotekarne tožbe z argumentom, da izvršilni naslov že obstaja, v primeru, da imetnik pravice slednje ne more uveljavljati preko izvršilnega naslova?

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je s sklepom zavrglo hipotekarno tožbo zaradi pomanjkanja pravnega interesa (I. točka izreka) ter odločilo, da mora tožeča stranka toženi stranki povrniti stroške pravdnega postopka (II. točka izreka).

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo zavrnilo in potrdilo sklep sodišča prve stopnje (I. točka izreka) ter odločilo, da tožeča stranka sama nosi svoje pritožbene stroške, toženi stranki pa mora povrniti njene stroške odgovora na pritožbo v višini 275,40 EUR z morebitnimi zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi (II. točka izreka).

3. Zoper sklep sodišča druge stopnje vlaga tožeča stranka predlog za dopustitev revizije.

4. Vrhovno sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato v tem obsegu dopustilo.

5. Sklep je bil sprejet soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).