Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 110/2023 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2023:III.DOR.110.2023 AI generated

Supreme Court allows review of civil liability contribution percentage for injured worker under ZPP Art. 367a.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 110/2023
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted permission for a review of the first-instance judgment regarding the allocation of liability percentages. The first defendant sought to challenge the 10% contribution assigned to an injured worker, while the second defendant's appeal was dismissed. The court determined that the conditions for review under Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure are met regarding this specific liability issue.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure; A review is permitted when the first-instance court's determination of a specific legal issue, such as the percentage of liability for an injured worker, is contested and meets the statutory criteria for appellate review.

Keywords

AI generated
Code of Civil Procedure liability contribution injured worker review permission percentage allocation civil liability appeal procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 324, paragraph 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure
AI generated
VSL sodba I Cpg 739/2006
Employer must pay reduced work time allowance to invalid II category employee who never started work due to illness.
VSL sodba I Cpg 827/2010
Appeal court dismisses claim against road authority for truck crash, holding maintenance duties distinct from new signalization installation.
VSRS Sodba II Ips 194/1992
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on personality rights violation where footage was filmed without consent for TV broadcast.
VDSS Sodba Pdp 749/2018
Appeal dismissed; employee's claim for damages rejected as he voluntarily worked in the sauna area.
VSL sklep I Cp 1529/99
Appeal granted; first-instance court remanded case to correct interest start date and legal basis for unjust enrichment claim.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je odločitev glede soprispevka oškodovanega delavca prve toženke A. A., ki je določen 10 %, upoštevajoč vse ugotovljene okoliščine, materialnopravno pravilna.

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je odločitev glede soprispevka oškodovanega delavca prve toženke A. A., ki je določen 10 %, upoštevajoč vse ugotovljene okoliščine, materialnopravno pravilna.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je prvi in drugi toženki naložilo plačilo 87.721,06 EUR z obrestmi (I. točka izreka), zavrnilo pa je tožbeni zahtevek za plačilo 9.746,79 EUR z obrestmi (II. točka izreka). Odločilo je še, da morata prva in druga toženka tožeči stranki povrniti 90 % njenih pravdnih stroškov, ki bodo odmerjeni s posebnim sklepom (III. točka izreka).

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je zavrnilo pritožbi prve in druge toženke ter sodbo sodišča prve stopnje v izpodbijanih I. in III. točki izreka potrdilo (I. točka izreka). Odločilo je, da prva in druga toženka sami krijeta svoje pritožbene stroške (II. točka izreka).

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje vlaga prva toženka predlog za dopustitev revizije.

4. Vrhovno sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367. a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato v tem obsegu dopustilo.

5. Sklep je bil sprejet soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).