Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL Sklep II Cpg 484/2023 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2023:II.CPG.484.2023 AI generated

Appeal dismissed for failure to state grounds; court ruled on costs ex officio under ZPP.

Case Number VSL Sklep II Cpg 484/2023
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Higher Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the first-instance ruling on legal costs. The appellant argued the parties lacked a business relationship, but the court found no grounds for this claim. Since the appellant failed to state specific grounds for appeal regarding costs, the court exercised its duty to examine the case ex officio under Article 350(2) of the Civil Procedure Act and confirmed the lower court's decision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 350(2) of the Civil Procedure Act; Article 353 of the Civil Procedure Act: If an appellant fails to state grounds for appeal, the court may examine the case ex officio for violations of the second paragraph of Article 350 and confirm the decision if no violations are found.

Keywords

AI generated
Civil Procedure Act legal costs ex officio review failure to state grounds appeal dismissal duty to examine confirmation of decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 350(2) of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 353 of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 458(5) of the Civil Procedure Act
AI generated
VDSS Sklep Pdp 166/2019
Appeal dismissed; withdrawal deemed timely if no procedural acts occurred between performance and withdrawal.
VSL sklep I Cpg 66/2015
Appeal allowed: Court reversed first instance costs ruling when debt was forcibly satisfied during litigation.
VDSS Sklep Psp 196/2024
Appeal dismissed; court rejects applying 100% lawyer fee increase to employer in social security disputes.
VDSS Sklep Psp 11/2025
Appeal dismissed; court rejects cost increase for employer status and administrative procedure costs.
VDSS Sklep Psp 92/2022
Appeal dismissed; first instance court correctly awarded full success after claim modification under ZPP Art. 154.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se zavrne in se izpodbijani sklep potrdi.

[JEDRO]

Višje sodišče je, ker v zvezi z odmero pravdnih stroškov toženka ni podala pritožbenih trditev, izpodbijani sklep po uradni dolžnosti preizkusilo glede kršitev iz drugega odstavka 350. člena ZPP. Ker te niso podane in je izpodbijani sklep pravilen in zakonit, je pritožbo zavrnilo in izpodbijani sklep potrdilo (353. člen ZPP).

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Z izpodbijanim sklepom je sodišče prve stopnje odločilo, da je toženka dolžna tožnici plačati 408,00 EUR stroškov pravdnega postopka v osmih dneh z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi za primer zamude.

2. Zoper sklep je laično pritožbo vložila toženka. Trdi, da dolžnik in upnik nista v poslovnem odnosu in ne drži, da bi imel dolžnik do upnika neporavnane obveznosti.

3. Tožnica na pritožbo ni odgovorila.

4. Pritožba ni utemeljena.

5. Sodišče prve stopnje je z izpodbijanim sklepom odločilo še o stroških pravdnega postopka, potem ko je sodba sodišča prve stopnje, s katero je to ugodilo tožbenemu zahtevku tožnice, postala pravnomočna.

6. Višje sodišče je, ker v zvezi z odmero pravdnih stroškov toženka ni podala pritožbenih trditev, izpodbijani sklep po uradni dolžnosti preizkusilo glede kršitev iz drugega odstavka 350. člena ZPP. Ker te niso podane in je izpodbijani sklep pravilen in zakonit, je pritožbo zavrnilo in izpodbijani sklep potrdilo (353. člen ZPP).

7. O pritožbi zoper sklep je na podlagi petega odstavka 458. člena ZPP odločala sodnica posameznica.