Supreme Court dismisses review application because the lower court's ruling did not legally terminate the proceedings. The review application is inadmissible because the appealed decision did not legally terminate the proceedings under Article 384(1) of the Civil Procedure Act. Consequently, the review application is inadmissible because the appealed decision did not legally terminate the proceedings under Article 384(1) of the Civil Procedure Act. Therefore, the review application is inadmissible because the appealed decision did not legally terminate the proceedings under Article 384(1) of the Civil Procedure Act.
Slovenia (SI)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court of Slovenia dismissed the applicant's request for permission to file a review appeal. The lower court had rejected the plaintiff's complaint and granted the intervenor's complaint, thereby vacating the first-instance judgment and remanding the case for a new decision. The Supreme Court ruled that the appealed decision did not legally conclude the proceedings under Article 384(1) of the Civil Procedure Act, rendering the review inadmissible.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArticle 384(1) of the Civil Procedure Act; A review application is inadmissible if the appealed decision does not legally terminate the proceedings in accordance with the first paragraph of Article 384 of the Civil Procedure Act.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Predlog se zavrže.
[JEDRO]
Izpodbijani sklep ni odločba, s katero se je postopek pravnomočno končal v smislu prvega odstavka 384. člena ZPP. Zato revizija zoper ta sklep ni dovoljena, s tem pa tudi ni dovoljen predlog za dopustitev revizije.
[OBRAZLOŽITEV]
1. Sodišče druge stopnje je zavrnilo pritožbo tožeče stranke in ugodilo pritožbi intervenienta, sodbo sodišča prve stopnje razveljavilo in zadevo vrnilo v ponovno odločanje.
2. Predlog ni dovoljen.
3. Izpodbijani sklep ni odločba, s katero se je postopek pravnomočno končal v smislu prvega odstavka 384. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju ZPP 1 ). Zato revizija zoper ta sklep ni dovoljena, s tem pa tudi ni dovoljen predlog za dopustitev revizije. Glede na to je Vrhovno sodišče predlog za dopustitev revizije zavrglo (377. člen ZPP).
4. Vrhovno sodišče je odločalo v senatu, ki je naveden v uvodu odločbe. Odločitev je sprejelo soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).
1 Uradni list RS, št. 26/99 s spremembami in dopolnitvami.