Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL Sklep II Cp 1397/2023 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2023:II.CP.1397.2023 AI generated

Appeal dismissed because court management decisions under ZPP Art. 270(3) are not appealable.

Case Number VSL Sklep II Cp 1397/2023
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The first-instance court ordered the social work center to facilitate a meeting between parents to resolve representation disputes. The first plaintiff filed an appeal as both a party and legal representative of the second plaintiff. The court rejected the appeal because the contested decision concerned procedural management, which Article 270(3) of the Civil Procedure Act explicitly excludes from appeal rights, a right not acquired through erroneous legal instruction.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 270(3) ZPP; Art. 365(1) ZPP: Decisions regarding the conduct of proceedings under Article 270(3) of the Civil Procedure Act are not subject to appeal, and the right to appeal cannot be acquired through erroneous legal instruction.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural management civil procedure act appeal inadmissibility court discretion legal representation dispute

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 270(3) ZPP
Art. 365(1) ZPP
AI generated
VDSS Sklep Psp 2/2022
Appeal allowed; first instance court erred by failing to determine adult daughter's residence status for family income calculation.
VSL sklep I Cp 1057/94
Appeal dismissed; court lacks jurisdiction over child custody in dissolution of cohabitation under ZZZDR.
VSL sklep I Cpg 1670/2013
Appeal dismissed; lack of statutory authority does not preclude specific owner authorization for management representative.
Sodba II Ips 487/2009
Appeal dismissed; clear inheritance agreement valid despite exceeding original inheritance proceeding scope.
Sklep I Up 340/2007
Appeal dismissed; plaintiff lacks legal interest to challenge administrative act regarding guardian appointment.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Zoper izpodbijani sklep pritožba ni dovoljena. Pravice do pritožbe pa stranka ne more pridobiti niti z napačnim pravnim poukom.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je z izpodbijanim sklepom Centru za socialno delo naložilo, naj v 15 dneh staršem drugega tožnika pomaga pri sklenitvi sporazuma glede zastopanja v tej pravdni zadevi tako, da ju povabi na neformalni razgovor in o tem obvesti sodišče.

2. Pritožbo zoper navedeni sklep vlaga prvi tožnik kot stranka in kot zakoniti zastopnik drugega tožnika.

3. Pritožba ni dovoljena.

4. Iz razlogov izpodbijanega sklepa izhaja, da ga je sodišče izdalo, ker je starša drugega tožnika želelo vzpodbuditi, da se sporazumeta o nadaljnjem vodenju pravde.

5. Gre za sklep, ki se nanaša na vodstvo postopka, zoper te odločitve pa po zakonu ni pritožbe (tretji odstavek 270. člena ZPP). Pravice do pritožbe stranka ne more pridobiti niti z napačnim pravnim poukom.

6. Iz navedenega razloga je pritožbeno sodišče pritožbo kot nedovoljeno zavrglo (1. točka 365. člena ZPP).