Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL Sklep II Cp 535/2023 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2023:II.CP.535.2023 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; appeal rejected due to late filing caused by non-payment of court fees and service issues.

Case Number VSL Sklep II Cp 535/2023
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court dismissed the appeal against a first-instance decision to terminate proceedings due to non-payment of court fees. The appellant argued discrimination based on their severe psychophysical condition, claiming unfair treatment. The court ruled the appeal inadmissible because it was filed one day after the deadline expired, a delay directly caused by the inability to serve the termination order via personal delivery.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP), 333. člen; 343. člen: An appeal is inadmissible if filed after the expiration of the appeal period, even if the delay was caused by procedural defects in service of the termination order, provided the appellant was not discriminated against.

Keywords

AI generated
inadmissible appeal expiration of appeal period non-payment of court fees termination of proceedings service of process discrimination claim procedural defect

Cited Legislation

AI generated
333. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP)
2. odstavek 343. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP)
2. točka 365. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP)
AI generated
VSL sklep II Cp 1108/2014
Appeal against fee order dismissed; appeal against judgment costs allowed as judgment and costs order form one decision.
VDSS sklep Psp 290/2015
Appeal granted; first-instance court wrongly dismissed claim due to lack of legal interest.
VSL Sklep I Cp 1424/2022
Appeal dismissed; son of detained person lacks standing to appeal without being designated nearest relative under Mental Health Act.
VSC Sklep III Cpg 94/2022
Appeal dismissed because creditor's withdrawal of security request extinguished the debtor's legal interest to contest the interim order.
VSL Sklep Cst 342/2018
Appeal dismissed; appeal by attorney via mail rejected under electronic filing rules for insolvency proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se zavrne in se sklep sodišča prve stopnje potrdi.

[JEDRO]

Pravilna in zakonita je odločitev, da se prepozna pritožba zavrže. Pritožnik ni bil v ničemer diskriminiran, saj obravnave v tej zadevi ni bilo - postopek se je ustavil, ker tožeča stranka ni plačala sodne takse.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Prvostopenjsko sodišče je zavrglo pritožbo toženca z dne 27. 1. 2023 proti sklepu o ustavitvi postopka z dne 21. 12. 2022.

2. Proti sklepu (o zavrženju) se je toženec pritožil. Navaja, da je sklep nezakonit, ker je, kot je razumeti, sam v težkem psihofizičnem stanju, smiselno očita, da je bil zato diskriminiran in želi, da se postopek vrne v prejšnje stanje.

3. Pritožba ni utemeljena.

4. Prvostopenjsko sodišče je, kot je že omenjeno, postopek v tej zadevi ustavilo, sklep o ustavitvi pa tožencu pustilo v poštnem nabiralniku, ker osebna vročitev ni bila mogoča. Na ta način mu je bil sklep vročen 18. 1. 2023, pritožbeni rok 8 dni pa se je se je iztekel 26. 1. 2023, zato je naslednjega dne vložena pritožba prepozna, kot je to pravilno ugotovilo in navedlo sodišče prve stopnje. Pravilna in zakonita je zato odločitev, da se prepozna pritožba zavrže (1. odst. 333. čl. in 2. odst. 343. čl. Zakona o pravdnem postopku - ZPP). Pritožnik ni bil v ničemer diskriminiran, saj obravnave v tej zadevi ni bilo - postopek se je ustavil, ker tožeča stranka ni plačala sodne takse.

5. Pritožbo je bilo treba zavrniti in sklep sodišča prve stopnje potrditi (2. tč. 365. čl. ZPP).