Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 144/2022 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2023:III.DOR.144.2022 AI generated

Supreme Court allows review regarding dismissal of payment claim under Section 72(5) of the Obligations Act.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 144/2022
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted the petition for leave to appeal concerning the dismissal of a payment claim. The lower court rejected the claim based on Section 72(5) of the Obligations Act, which bars claims for damages arising from the termination of a contract. The court determined that the specific legal question regarding the application of this provision in the concrete circumstances met the statutory criteria for review under the Code of Civil Procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Prvi odstavek 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku; Peti odstavek 72. člena Obligacijskega zakonika: Review is permitted when the application of a specific statutory provision regarding the inadmissibility of a claim for damages due to contract termination requires clarification of its scope in the concrete case.

Keywords

AI generated
leave to appeal Obligations Act contract termination damages claim Section 72(5) ZPP Article 367a inadmissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Prvi odstavek 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP)
Peti odstavek 72. člena Obligacijskega zakonika (OZ)
AI generated
Sklep III DoR 15/2011
Supreme Court dismisses review application as lower court found different facts rendering legal questions irrelevant.
Sodba III Ips 157/2009
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; delivery notes valid for broader signatories but contract amendments require authorized persons.
Sklep II DoR 288/2013
Supreme Court dismisses revision request regarding mental pain damages for severe disability of a close relative.
Sodba II Ips 550/2001
Court dismisses appeal, ruling a final sports federation club transfer order legally binds clubs and validates payment.
VSL sodba I Cpg 904/2012
Court dismisses appeal confirming that wagon delay damages are not transport costs and claim for unjust enrichment failed due to lack of proof of mistake.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja: ali je v okoliščinah konkretnega primera pravilno stališče sodišča druge stopnje o neutemeljenosti tožbenega zahtevka na temelju petega odstavka 72. člena OZ?

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je v okoliščinah konkretnega primera pravilno stališče sodišča druge stopnje o neutemeljenosti tožbenega zahtevka na temelju petega odstavka 72. člena OZ.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbi tožene stranke ugodilo in spremenilo sodbo sodišča prve stopnje tako, da je zavrnilo tožbeni zahtevek za plačilo 292.797,56 EUR s pripadki.

2. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje vlaga tožeča stranka predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Vrhovno sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato v tem obsegu dopustilo.

4. Sklep je bil sprejet soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).