Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL Sklep II Cpg 175/2023 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2023:II.CPG.175.2023 AI generated

Appeal dismissed because the appeal was filed after the deadline expired due to summer court limitations.

Case Number VSL Sklep II Cpg 175/2023
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Higher Court in Ljubljana dismissed the appeal lodged by the appellant against a first-instance judgment. The appellant submitted the appeal via registered mail on August 24, 2022, which was after the statutory deadline had expired. The court determined that the appeal period began running only after the summer court session ended because the judgment was served during the limited summer operating period. Consequently, the appeal was deemed untimely and inadmissible under the relevant procedural code.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP), Zakon o sodiščih (ZS); An appeal filed after the expiration of the appeal period, which begins to run after the end of the summer court session if the judgment was served during that period, is inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
summer court session limited operating period expirated appeal period inadmissible appeal service of judgment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
drugi odstavek 343. člena ZPP
2022, torej po izteku pritožbenega roka, zato je njena pritožba prepozna (drugi odstavek 343. člena ZPP).
prvi odstavek 83. člena ZS
četrti odstavek 83. člena ZS
142. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP)
Toženki je bila izpodbijana sodba vročena z nadomestno vročitvijo po določbi 142. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP).
prvi odstavek 346. člena ZPP
Ker pritožbe ni zavrglo sodišče prve stopnje, je odločitev o njenem zavrženju sprejelo višje sodišče (prvi odstavek 346. člena ZPP).
AI generated
VSL Sklep I Cp 1523/2023
Appeal dismissed; late fee waiver request invalidates appeal due to procedural preconditions under ZPP. Appeal dismissed; late fee waiver request invalidates appeal due to procedural preconditions. Appeal dismissed; late fee waiver request invalidates appeal due to procedural preconditions.
VSC Sklep I Ip 246/2021
Appeal dismissed because debtors missed the 8-day appeal deadline in enforcement proceedings despite pandemic delays.
VSC Sklep I Cp 458/2021
Appeal dismissed because appeal filed after 8-day deadline for small value disputes expired. Appeal filed on Saturday deemed received after deadline. Court upheld first instance decision. Appeal dismissed due to late filing after 8-day deadline for small value disputes. Appeal mailed Saturday deemed received after deadline expired. Court upheld first instance decision on timeliness.
VSRS Sklep II DoR 14/2023
Supreme Court dismisses appeal permission request due to non-payment of court fees within statutory deadlines.
VDSS sklep Pdp 1134/2013
Appeal dismissed because the appeal was filed after the statutory deadline expired. The court confirmed the first-instance court's decision. The appeal was rejected as untimely. The court ruled the appeal was filed too late. The appeal was rejected due to procedural timeliness. The appeal was dismissed for being untimely. The appeal was rejected as it was filed after the deadline. The appeal was dismissed because it was filed too late. The appeal was rejected due to the expiration of the appeal period.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Pritožnica je pritožbo vložila priporočeno po pošti 24. 8. 2022, torej po izteku pritožbenega roka, zato je njena pritožba prepozna (drugi odstavek 343. člena ZPP).

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je 19. 7. 2022 izdalo sodbo, zoper katero je toženka 24. 8. 2022 vložila pritožbo.

2. Pritožba je prepozna.

3. Toženki je bila izpodbijana sodba vročena z nadomestno vročitvijo po določbi 142. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP). Obvestilo ji je bilo puščeno 20. 7. 2022, vročitev pa je bila opravljena s potekom 15-dnevnega roka, tj. 4. 8. 2022 (podatki o pošiljki pri list. št. 45 in poizvednica na list. št. 51). Prvi odstavek 83. člena Zakona o sodiščih (ZS) določa, da sodišča v času od 15. 7. do 15. 8. poslujejo v omejenem obsegu (poletno poslovanje). Ker je bilo pisanje toženki vročeno med poletnim poslovanjem sodišča, je začel v skladu s četrtim odstavkom 83. člena ZS rok za vložitev pritožbe teči po izteku poletnega poslovanja. Osemdnevni rok za vložitev pritožbe je tako začel teči s 16. 8. 2022 in se je iztekel 23. 8. 2012.

4. Pritožnica je pritožbo vložila priporočeno po pošti 24. 8. 2022, torej po izteku pritožbenega roka, zato je njena pritožba prepozna (drugi odstavek 343. člena ZPP). Ker pritožbe ni zavrglo sodišče prve stopnje, je odločitev o njenem zavrženju sprejelo višje sodišče (prvi odstavek 346. člena ZPP).