Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep II DoR 68/2023 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2023:II.DOR.68.2023 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal request for leave to appeal regarding condominium reserve fund contribution increase.

Case Number VSRS Sklep II DoR 68/2023
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the defendant's request for leave to appeal the second-instance judgment. The defendant argued that increasing the reserve fund contribution without unanimous owner consent violated constitutional property rights and improperly shifted the burden of proof. The court found the request inadmissible because the conditions for granting leave to appeal under the Code of Civil Procedure were not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

367.a ZPP; 367.c ZPP: A request for leave to appeal is inadmissible if the statutory conditions for granting such leave are not fulfilled, regardless of the substantive constitutional or evidentiary arguments raised by the appellant.

Keywords

AI generated
leave to appeal condominium reserve fund property rights burden of proof Code of Civil Procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
367.a ZPP
367.c ZPP
324 ZPP
AI generated
VSL Sodba I Cp 2023/2023
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance judgment on debt and costs due to proper service by fiction.
VSL Sodba I Cp 1339/2023
Appeal dismissed; higher contribution to reserve fund valid when linked to approved maintenance plan.
VSL Sodba I Cpg 310/2017
Appeal dismissed; court rules business premises not covered by SZ-1 and lease agreement cannot bind third parties. Appeal dismissed; court rules business premises not covered by SZ-1 and lease agreement cannot bind third parties. Appeal dismissed; court rules business premises not covered by SZ-1 and lease agreement cannot bind third parties.
VSL sodba II Cp 1721/2014
Higher contribution to reserve fund requires maintenance plan under Slovenian Condominium Law.
VSC Sodba Cp 83/2020
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance judgment on unpaid subscription fees and costs due to lack of new evidence.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Predlog se zavrne.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je v (za predlog relevantni) IV. točki izreka odločilo, da je tožena stranka dolžna plačati v rezervni sklad večstanovanjske stavbe na naslovu ... znesek 1.357,22 EUR, skupaj z v izreku navedenimi zamudnimi obrestmi, na fiduciarni račun, ki ga vodi tožeča stranka.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo tožene stranke zoper odločitev v tem delu zavrnilo in sodbo sodišča prve stopnje potrdilo (II. točka izreka).

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje tožena stranka vlaga predlog za dopustitev revizije in predlaga, da Vrhovno sodišče dopusti revizijo glede vprašanj: 1. Ali je z vidika 33. in 67. člena Ustave RS ustavno skladna razlaga sodišča druge stopnje glede zvišanja in izterjave prispevka za rezervni sklad stavbe? 2. V katerih primerih pomeni zvišanje prispevka za rezervni sklad brez soglasja etažnih lastnikov protiustaven poseg v lastninsko pravico in pravni položaj etažnih lastnikov, ki zvišanju prispevka nasprotujejo? 3. Ali sta nižji sodišči pravilno uporabili pravila o trditvenem in dokaznem bremenu tožeče stranke glede višine tožbenega zahtevka?

4. Predlog ni utemeljen.

5. Ker niso izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju ZPP), je Vrhovno sodišče na podlagi drugega odstavka 367.c člena ZPP predlog tožene stranke zavrnilo.

6. Vrhovno sodišče je odločitev sprejelo soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).