Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 160/2022 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2023:III.DOR.160.2022 AI generated

Supreme Court allows review of second instance court's finding that bank guarantee demand did not meet conditions.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 160/2022
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted the review request regarding the second instance court's decision to reject the plaintiff's claim for bank guarantee payment. The second instance court overturned the first instance judgment, ruling that the plaintiff's written demand for unification of the guarantee did not satisfy the specific conditions outlined within the guarantee itself. The court permitted the review because the question of whether the lower court correctly applied these material legal conditions to the specific facts was deemed suitable for final adjudication.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP), 367.a odst. 1; Review is permitted when the second instance court's material legal stance on whether a written demand for guarantee unification meets the conditions specified in the guarantee is open to final review.

Keywords

AI generated
bank guarantee unification material legal conditions second instance court review request admissibility ZPP 367.a plaintiff's written demand guarantee validity

Cited Legislation

AI generated
367.a odst. 1 ZPP
324. odst. 7 ZPP
AI generated
VSRS Sodba III Ips 21/2019-3
Supreme Court dismisses appeal for late submission of bank guarantee repayment arguments violating procedural deadlines.
VSRS Sklep III Ips 14/2023
Supreme Court suspends appeal process pending Constitutional Court ruling on Article 377 of the Civil Procedure Act.
VSRS Sklep III Ips 40/2016
Supreme Court allows appeal, overturns second instance dismissal, orders new trial on contractor damages claim.
VSRS Sklep III Ips 84/2017-3
Court vacates second instance judgment for remittal due to procedural violation of evidence assessment rules.
VSL Sodba I Cpg 900/2018
Court dismisses appeal against bank guarantee claim, ruling economic criteria cannot override contract terms.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je materialnopravno pravilno stališče sodišča druge stopnje, da v okoliščinah konkretnega primera pisna zahteva za unovčenje garancije po obliki in vsebini ne ustreza pogojem za unovčenje, navedenim v tej isti garanciji.

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je materialnopravno pravilno stališče sodišča druge stopnje, da v okoliščinah konkretnega primera pisna zahteva za unovčenje garancije po obliki in vsebini ne ustreza pogojem za unovčenje, navedenim v tej isti garanciji.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je toženi stranki naložilo, da je tožeči stranki iz naslova unovčitve bančne garancije dolžna plačati znesek 1,130.363,69 EUR s pripadajočimi zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbi tožene stranke ugodilo in sodbo sodišča prve stopnje spremenilo tako, da je tožbeni zahtevek zavrnilo.

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje tožeča stranka vlaga predlog za dopustitev revizije.

4. Vrhovno sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato v tem obsegu dopustilo.

5. Senat je sklep sprejel soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).