Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL Sklep II Cp 1978/2022 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2022:II.CP.1978.2022 AI generated

Appeal dismissed because no special appeal exists for rejecting a judge's recusal request; only appeal against final judgment is allowed.

Case Number VSL Sklep II Cp 1978/2022
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court dismissed the appellant's appeal against the first instance court's rejection of a recusal request. The appellant argued for the judge's removal but failed to provide specific grounds under the relevant procedural code. The court ruled that no special appeal mechanism exists for such interim rulings, which can only be challenged via the appeal against the final judgment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Peti odstavek 73. člena ZPP; tretji odstavek 363. člena ZPP: Against a ruling rejecting a party's request for a judge's recusal, no special appeal is permitted; such a ruling may only be challenged in the appeal against the final judgment.

Keywords

AI generated
recusal request special appeal procedural law interim ruling appeal against judgment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
5th paragraph of Article 73 of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPP)
3rd paragraph of Article 363 of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPP)
1st paragraph of Article 343 of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPP)
2nd paragraph of Article 365 of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPP)
AI generated
VDSS Sklep Pdp 597/2021
Appeal against a procedural ruling on standing is dismissed as an inadmissible procedural act under ZPP. The court rejected the appeal because the specific procedural step was not foreseen by law. The appeal was deemed inadmissible because the specific procedural step was not foreseen by law. The appeal was rejected because the specific procedural step was not foreseen by law.
VSL Sklep I Cpg 301/2021
Appeal dismissed; request for recusal filed after main hearing is time-barred under ZPP s. 72.2.
VSL sklep I Cp 562/2009
Appeal dismissed; no special appeal exists against a ruling rejecting a request for judge recusal under ZPP. No special appeal exists against a ruling rejecting a request for judge recusal under ZPP. No special appeal exists against a ruling rejecting a request for judge recusal under ZPP.
VDSS sklep Psp 149/2015
Appeal against second-instance labor court judgment dismissed as inadmissible under ZPP Art. 343(1).
VSC Sklep I Cp 27/2021
Appeal against a second-instance court's decision to reject a plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as legally inadmissible.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se zavrne in se potrdi sklep sodišča prve stopnje.

[JEDRO]

Zoper sklep, s katerim je bila zavrnjena strankina zahteva za izločitev sodnika, ni posebne pritožbe (peti odstavek 73. člena ZPP), kot je v izpodbijanem sklepu pravilno pojasnilo prvo sodišče. Sklep o zavrnitvi njegove zahteve za izločitev sodnice bo tožnik lahko izpodbijal v pritožbi zoper končno odločbo (tretji odstavek 363. člena ZPP).

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje (prvo sodišče) je z izpodbijanim sklepom zavrglo pritožbo tožnika zoper sklep z dne 26. 4. 2022, s katerim je bila zavrnjena njegova zahteva za izločitev sodnice.

2. Zoper sklep se pritožuje tožnik, ki uveljavlja vse pritožbene razloge iz 338. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP). Predlaga, da pritožbeno sodišče spremeni izpodbijani sklep tako, da se ugodi njegovi zahtevi za izločitev sodnice. V laični pritožbi razlaga, zakaj bi moralo biti ugodeno njegovi zahtevi za izločitev sodnice.

3. Pritožba ni utemeljena.

4. Zoper sklep, s katerim je bila zavrnjena strankina zahteva za izločitev sodnika, ni posebne pritožbe (peti odstavek 73. člena ZPP), kot je v izpodbijanem sklepu pravilno pojasnilo prvo sodišče. Sklep o zavrnitvi njegove zahteve za izločitev sodnice bo tožnik lahko izpodbijal v pritožbi zoper končno odločbo (tretji odstavek 363. člena ZPP). Ker posebna pritožba zoper sklep z dne 26. 4. 2022 ni dovoljena, jo je prvo sodišče pravilno zavrglo kot nedovoljeno (prvi odstavek 343. člena ZPP).

5. Ker uveljavljani in uradoma upoštevni pritožbeni razlogi niso podani, je pritožbeno sodišče zavrnilo pritožbo kot neutemeljeno ter potrdilo izpodbijani sklep (2. točka 365. člena ZPP).