Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep II DoR 490/2022 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2023:II.DOR.490.2022 AI generated

Supreme Court rejects review application as legal issues do not meet statutory criteria for review permission.

Case Number VSRS Sklep II DoR 490/2022
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicants' request for permission to file a review appeal against the second-instance court's decision. The lower courts had dismissed the plaintiffs' claim to sell their co-ownership share in disputed real estate, and the applicants argued the review should be allowed on multiple grounds. The court determined that the legal questions raised did not meet the statutory requirements for a review, specifically failing to address issues of significant importance for legal certainty or uniform application of law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku 367.a odst. 1; 367.c odst. 2: A review application is only admissible if the decision can be expected to resolve a legal issue of significant importance for legal certainty, uniform application of law, or the development of law through case law.

Keywords

AI generated
review permission criteria supreme court review legal certainty requirement uniform application of law co-ownership share dispute real estate sale contract second instance decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
367.a odst. 1 ZPP
367.c odst. 2 ZPP
324. odst. 7 ZPP
AI generated
VSL Sodba I Cp 1183/2022
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first instance rejection of contract claim due to lack of evidence for additional payment.
UPRS Sodba IV U 60/2022-23
Administrative court dismissed appeal, ruling pre-emptive right requires farmer status at offer acceptance.
VSK sodba Cpg 223/2010
Appeal dismissed; sale to third party without prior purchaser notice invalidates transfer under OZ s. 512. and SPZ s. 66(3).
VSRS Sklep III Ips 12/2025
Supreme Court dismisses appeal because the appellant company was deleted without liquidation and no bankruptcy was filed.
VSL sodba I Cpg 1867/2014
Appeal dismissed; sale contract void for improper subject matter not authorized by bankruptcy court.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Predlog se zavrne.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je zavrnilo zahtevek tožnikov za sklenitev prodajne pogodbe s tožencem, za nakup solastniškega deleža 36/100 sporne nepremičnine.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je zavrnilo pritožbo tožnikov in potrdilo sodbo sodišča prve stopnje.

3. Zoper takšno sodbo vlagata tožnika predlog za dopustitev revizije. V njem predlagata, da se revizija dopusti glede več, obsežno zastavljenih vprašanj.

4. Predlog ni utemeljen.

5. Vrhovno sodišče dopusti revizijo, če je od njegove odločitve mogoče pričakovati odločitev o pravnem vprašanju, pomembnem za zagotovitev pravne varnosti, enotne uporabe prava ali za razvoj prava prek sodne prakse (prvi odstavek 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku, v nadaljevanju ZPP). V konkretni zadevi glede na odločitev nižjih sodišč ponujena vprašanja tem merilom ne ustrezajo. Pogoji za dopustitev revizije tako niso izpolnjeni, zato je Vrhovno sodišče predlog zavrnilo (drugi odstavek 367.c člena ZPP).

6. Vrhovno sodišče je odločalo v senatu, navedenem v uvodu sklepa. Odločitev je sprejelo soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).