Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 146/2021 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2021:III.DOR.146.2021 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses review application against second-instance judgment terminating lease sale agreement.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 146/2021
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court rejected the plaintiff's application for permission to appeal the second-instance judgment. The lower courts had initially voided a settlement regarding a leaseback agreement and ordered the lessor to pay the lessee a difference in value, but the second instance reversed this and dismissed the claim entirely. The court denied the review because the statutory conditions for allowing an appeal under the Code of Civil Procedure were not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

367.a ZPP; 367.c ZPP: A review application is inadmissible if the applicant fails to demonstrate that the lower court's decision violates the law or contains a significant error of fact, as required by the Code of Civil Procedure.

Keywords

AI generated
review application permission to appeal leaseback agreement settlement voiding Code of Civil Procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
367.a ZPP
367.c ZPP
324. ZPP
AI generated
sodba I U 871/2010
Court dismisses tax appeal where taxpayer used inconsistent property values across different tax proceedings without legal basis.
sodba I U 958/2010
Court dismisses tax appeal, ruling financial lease agreements do not constitute capital acquisition for tax purposes.
VSL sodba I Cp 3421/2009
Appeal dismissed; contract price indeterminable without third-party appointment per Obligations Act.
VSM Sodba in sklep I Cpg 89/2021
Court allows appeal in financial lease dispute, rejecting claim for surplus value due to lessee's breach.
VSL Sklep Cst 82/2025
Appeal dismissed; court upheld auction price reduction after failed sales in personal bankruptcy proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Predlog se zavrne.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je v razmerju med tožnico in toženko razveljavilo učinke dogovora in z njim povezane tožničine izjave z dne 19. 4. 2017, s katerim je bila med pravdnima strankama dogovorjena prodaja predmeta leasinga (rovokopača)po ceni 37.697,21 EUR (skupaj z DDV), ter odločilo, da tožnica (leasingojemalka) nima do toženke (leasingodajalka) nobenih terjatev oziroma zahtev in jih tudi ne bo uveljavljala iz naslova leasing pogodbe (I. točka izreka). Nadalje je odločilo še, da je toženka dolžna tožnici plačati znesek 22.347,11 EUR s pripadajočimi zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi (II. točka izreka). Znesek 22.347,11 EUR predstavlja razliko med s strani izvedenca ocenjeno in prodajno vrednostjo rovokopača.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbi toženke ugodilo in sodbo sodišča prve stopnje spremenilo tako, da je tožbeni zahtevek v celoti zavrnilo.

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje vlaga tožnica predlog za dopustitev revizije.

4. Ker niso izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP), je Vrhovno sodišče na podlagi drugega odstavka 367.c člena ZPP predlog tožnice zavrnilo.

5. Sklep je bil sprejet soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).