Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 95/2022 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2022:III.DOR.95.2022 AI generated

Supreme Court allows review regarding the second instance court's assessment of unjustified bank guarantee conversion.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 95/2022
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted permission for a review of the second instance court's decision. The lower courts ruled that a bank guarantee was unjustifiably converted, ordering the defendant to pay over 50,000 EUR plus legal interest. The Supreme Court determined that the conditions for review under the Code of Civil Procedure were met specifically regarding the correctness of the second instance court's evaluation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367a paragraph 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure; Review is permitted when the second instance court's assessment of the unjustified conversion of a bank guarantee is questionable.

Keywords

AI generated
unjustified conversion bank guarantee review permission second instance court Code of Civil Procedure financial liability legal interest

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367a paragraph 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 324 paragraph 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure
AI generated
VSL Sklep I Cpg 123/2022
Appeal granted; trial court violated constitutional right to evidence by refusing witness and expert testimony on forged signatures.
VSRS sklep II DoR 447/2014
Supreme Court dismisses appeal admissibility request as statutory conditions for review permission were not met.
VSL Sodba II Cp 3198/2016
Loan contract upheld; plaintiff failed to prove agreement that loan was for closing lobbying payment books.
VSL Sodba I Cpg 369/2021
Appeal dismissed; court upheld contract performance based on invoice reduction and proper service notification.
VSL Sodba I Cpg 1099/2016
Court dismisses appeal in financial leasing dispute, upholding liability for breach of contract and guarantee obligations.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je pravilna presoja sodišča druge stopnje o neutemeljenem unovčenju bančne garancije.

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je pravilna presoja sodišča druge stopnje o neutemeljenem unovčenju bančne garancije.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je ugodilo tožbenemu zahtevku in naložilo toženi stranki, da mora v roku 15 dni po vročitvi sodbe plačati tožeči stranki znesek v višini 50.727,48 EUR z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi od 13. 1. 2015 dalje do plačila (I. točka izreka). Toženi stranki je naložilo, da tožeči stranki plača pravdne stroške v višini 8.204,10 EUR v roku 15 dni od prejema sodbe z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi (II. točka izreka).

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo zavrnilo in potrdilo sodbo sodišča prve stopnje (I. točk izreka); o stroških pa odločilo tako, da tožena stranka krije sama svoje stroške pritožbenega postopka, mora pa tožeči stranki plačati pritožbene stroške v višini 839,06 EUR v roku 15 dni od prejema sodbe, v primeru zamude z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi za čas zamude (II. in III. točka izreka).

3. Tožena stranka je zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije.

4. Vrhovno sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je v tem obsegu dopustilo.

5. Senat je sklep sprejel soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).