Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep V DoR 6/2022 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2022:V.DOR.6.2022 AI generated

Supreme Court allows review regarding whether pension fund can calculate pension differently than insured person's chosen plan under ZPIZ-2 Art. 416.

Case Number VSRS Sklep V DoR 6/2022
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted the applicant's request for leave to appeal against the Administrative Court's dismissal of their lawsuit. The applicant challenged an agency decision regarding the calculation of a pension rent, arguing it deviated from the insured person's chosen payment plan under Article 416 of the Pension Insurance Act. The court determined that the conditions for appeal were met because the lower court failed to address the specific legal question concerning the fund's authority to deviate from the insured's plan.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 416 of the Pension Insurance Act 2004; Article 367.a paragraph 1 of the Act on Legal Proceedings; The Supreme Court allows a review when the lower court fails to decide on the specific legal question of whether a pension fund may calculate a pension rent in a manner inconsistent with the insured person's chosen payment plan.

Keywords

AI generated
pension insurance act pension rent calculation insured person plan leave to appeal administrative litigation ZPIZ-2 article 416 pension fund authority

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 416 of the Pension Insurance Act 2004
Article 367.a paragraph 1 of the Act on Legal Proceedings
Article 22 paragraph 1 of the Act on Administrative Disputes
AI generated
VSRS Sklep II DoR 95/2024
Supreme Court dismisses appeal request due to failure to pay court fees within the statutory deadline.
VSRS Sklep I Up 249/2024
Appeal dismissed; direct review without prior permission request is inadmissible under ZPP Art. 374(2).
UPRS Sodba I U 10/2020-8
Administrative court denies free legal aid in administrative litigation for appeal of administrative court decision.
VSRS Sklep III DoR 78/2023
Supreme Court dismisses appeal against rejection of review application permission as no appeal right exists.
VSRS Sklep X Ips 291/2014
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when administrative grant dispute lacks monetary right element for review threshold.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja: Ali je pokojninski družbi na podlagi 416. člena ZPIZ-2 dopustno naložiti obveznost izračuna višine pokojninske rente na način, ki ni skladen s pokojninskim načrtom za izplačevanje rent, ki si ga izbere zavarovanec?

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja: Ali je pokojninski družbi na podlagi 416. člena ZPIZ-2 dopustno naložiti obveznost izračuna višine pokojninske rente na način, ki ni skladen s pokojninskim načrtom za izplačevanje rent, ki si ga izbere zavarovanec?

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Upravno sodišče je v delu, ki je relevanten za odločanje o predlogu za dopustitev revizije, zavrnilo tožbo zoper odločbo Agencije za zavarovalni nadzor št. 40102-7/2020-8 z dne 2. 7. 2020 in odločilo, da vsaka stranka trpi svoje stroške postopka.

2. Zoper sodbo Upravnega sodišča vlaga tožeča stranka predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Vrhovno sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP), v zvezi s prvim odstavkom 22. člena Zakona o upravnem sporu, glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato v tem obsegu dopustilo.

4. Sklep je bil sprejet soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).