Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 105/2022 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2022:III.DOR.105.2022 AI generated

Appeal allowed regarding Supreme Court's jurisdiction ruling dismissing a plaintiff's lawsuit.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 105/2022
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia permitted the appeal specifically concerning the lower court's decision to dismiss the case due to lack of jurisdiction. The plaintiff had filed a lawsuit, but the second-instance court ruled in favor of the defendant, rejecting the claim on jurisdictional grounds and ordering the plaintiff to bear legal costs. The appellate court found that the conditions for allowing the appeal were met under the relevant procedural law regarding this specific jurisdictional question.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku, 367.a odst. 1: An appeal is admissible regarding a second-instance court's decision that a matter does not fall within judicial jurisdiction if the conditions for appeal are satisfied.

Keywords

AI generated
jurisdictional dispute appeal admissibility second instance court procedural law dismissal of lawsuit

Cited Legislation

AI generated
367.a odst. 1 ZPP
324. odst. 7 ZPP
AI generated
VSL sklep I Cpg 1623/2015
Appeal allowed; court extends service deadline when postal service delays delivery due to holidays.
VSC Sklep Cp 44/2021
Appeal dismissed; plaintiff failed to prove prior attempt to resolve dispute with state via State Attorney's Office as required by law.
VSL Sklep I Cpg 1147/2005
Appeal allowed; conditional withdrawal consent invalidates withdrawal, requiring new trial.
VSL Sklep I Cpg 355/2020
Appeal court overturned lower court ruling, holding arbitration clause in general terms does not cover distribution agreement disputes.
VSRS Sklep VIII DoR 35/2022-6
Supreme Court rejects revision request regarding scholarship eligibility interpretation under ZIUOOPE and ZŠtip-1.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je pravilna odločitev sodišča druge stopnje, da zadeva, o kateri je bila s strani tožeče stranke vložena tožba, ne spada v sodno pristojnost?

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je pravilna odločitev sodišča druge stopnje, da zadeva, o kateri je bila s strani tožeče stranke vložena tožba, ne spada v sodno pristojnost.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče druge stopnje je ugodilo pritožbi tožene stranke in sklep sodišča prve stopnje spremenilo tako, da je ugovoru sodne pristojnosti ugodilo in tožbo zavrglo. Tožeči stranki je naložilo povračilo pravdnih stroškov toženi stranki.

2. Zoper sklep sodišča druge stopnje vlaga tožeča stranka predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Revizijsko sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju ZPP) glede v izreku opredeljenega spornega pravnega vprašanja. Revizijo je zato glede njega dopustilo.

4. Sklep je bil sprejet soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).