Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep V DoR 2/2022 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2022:V.DOR.2.2022 AI generated

Supreme Court allows review of administrative court ruling issued without main hearing under constitutional and ECHR standards.

Case Number VSRS Sklep V DoR 2/2022
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia permitted a review application regarding an administrative court's decision rendered without a main hearing. The applicant argued this procedure violated the Constitution and the European Convention on Human Rights. The Court found that the specific legal question raised met the statutory criteria for allowing a review.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 22 of the Constitution; Article 6 of the ECHR; A review application is admissible when the question concerns whether a court's procedure in an administrative dispute, decided without a main hearing, complies with constitutional and ECHR guarantees of a fair trial.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative dispute main hearing requirement fair trial rights review admissibility constitutional compliance European Convention procedural fairness

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 22 of the Constitution
Article 6 of the ECHR
Section 367.a of the Act on Legal Proceedings
Section 22 of the Act on Administrative Disputes
AI generated
VDSS Sodba Psp 91/2018
Appeal court quashes first-instance social court ruling due to procedural violation of Article 7 of the Civil Procedure Act.
VSRS Sklep X Ips 24/2024
Supreme Court dismisses appeal because the applicant failed to request permission for review within the statutory deadline.
Sklep I Up 919/2005
Administrative court halts proceedings when plaintiff withdraws appeal before first instance decision. Plaintiff bears all costs as defendant won prior appeal.
VSRS Sklep VIII DoR 35/2022-6
Supreme Court rejects revision request regarding scholarship eligibility interpretation under ZIUOOPE and ZŠtip-1.
Sklep I Up 576/2012
Supreme Court allows appeal against dismissal of administrative lawsuit by co-plaintiffs as joint defendants under ZPP Art. 196.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja: Ali je v skladu z 22. členom Ustave in 6. členom EKČP postopanje sodišča, ki v upravnem sporu zoper odločbo Agencije za zavarovalni nadzor na podlagi določbe 448. člena ZZavar-1 izda sodbo brez izvedbe glavne obravnave?

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, Ali je v skladu z 22. členom Ustave in 6. členom EKČP postopanje sodišča, ki v upravnem sporu zoper odločbo Agencije za zavarovalni nadzor na podlagi določbe 448. člena ZZavar-1 izda sodbo brez izvedbe glavne obravnave.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Upravno sodišče je tožbo zavrnilo (I. točka izreka) in odločilo, da vsaka stranka trpi svoje stroške postopka (II. točka izreka).

2. Zoper sodbo Upravnega sodišča vlaga tožeča stranka predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Vrhovno sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP), v zvezi s prvim odstavkom 22. člena Zakona o upravnem sporu, glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato v tem obsegu dopustilo.

4. Sklep je bil sprejet soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).