Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 83/2022 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2022:III.DOR.83.2022 AI generated

Supreme Court allows review regarding suspension of proceedings before a prior question judgment in a separate enforcement case.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 83/2022
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted the request for review to examine whether the lower court correctly suspended proceedings pending a prior question judgment in a separate enforcement case. The appellant sought to overturn a decision blocking enforcement against a debtor company due to alleged ownership rights. The court determined that the conditions for review under the Civil Procedure Act were met for this specific procedural issue.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367a paragraph 1 of the Civil Procedure Act; Article 327 paragraph 1 of the Civil Procedure Act: A review is admissible when the lower court suspends proceedings pending a prior question judgment in another case, provided the review addresses the legality of that suspension.

Keywords

AI generated
review admissibility suspension of proceedings prior question judgment enforcement case Civil Procedure Act

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367a paragraph 1 of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 327 paragraph 1 of the Civil Procedure Act
AI generated
VSL Sklep Cst 290/2020
Appeal dismissed; court upheld rejection of bankruptcy petition over later-found assets due to lack of proof for damages claim.
VSK sklep Cpg 269/2012
Appeal court allows appeal and suspends erasure proceeding due to lack of proof of non-operation.
VSRS Sklep V DoR 5/2025
Supreme Court allows review regarding insurance agency's statutory authority to decide on forced liquidation continuation.
VSK Sklep II Cpg 45/2018
Court allows creditor to raise non-existence of deletion grounds in deregistration proceedings under ZFPPIPP Art. 427(1)(2).
VSL sklep IV Cpg 1586/2015
Appeal dismissed; business address deletion ground fails if owner consented to registration via notarized statement.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je sodišče v primeru, ko prekine postopek do rešitve predhodnega vprašanja v drugem sodnem postopku, vezano na sodno poravnavo, sklenjeno v tem drugem postopku, s katero je bilo odločeno o predhodnem vprašanju.

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je sodišče v primeru, ko prekine postopek do rešitve predhodnega vprašanja v drugem sodnem postopku, vezano na sodno poravnavo, sklenjeno v tem drugem postopku, s katero je bilo odločeno o predhodnem vprašanju.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je zavrnilo tožbeni zahtevek za ugotovitev, da ni dopustna izvršba s prodajo nepremičnin dolžnika (družbe A. d.d. Ljubljana – v likvidaciji) z ID znakom parcel ..., ... in ..., ker ima tožeča stranka na njih lastninsko pravico, ki preprečuje izvršbo.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo tožeče stranke zavrnilo in sodbo sodišča prve stopnje potrdilo.

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje vlaga tožeča stranka predlog za dopustitev revizije.

4. Vrhovno sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato v tem obsegu dopustilo.

5. Senat je odločitev sprejel soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).