Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 88/2022 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2022:III.DOR.88.2022 AI generated

Supreme Court allows review regarding court's duty to hold a hearing for evidence gathering in business dispute proceedings.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 88/2022
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted the review request concerning the court's obligation to conduct a hearing when parties seek evidence through witness or representative interrogation under Article 546.b of the Companies Act. The lower courts had appointed a special auditor to verify transactions between related parties, prompting the opposing party to file for review. The court decided to allow the review because the conditions set forth in Article 367.a of the Code of Civil Procedure were met regarding the specific legal question.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367.a of the Code of Civil Procedure; Article 37 of the Code of Non-Contentious Procedure; Article 50 of the Companies Act: A review is admissible when the lower courts fail to address whether the court must hold a hearing to execute evidence gathering measures such as interrogating a legal representative or witness to prove relevant factual circumstances in proceedings governed by Article 546.b of the Companies Act.

Keywords

AI generated
business dispute proceedings evidence gathering hearing related party transactions special auditor appointment review admissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367.a of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 37 of the Code of Non-Contentious Procedure
Article 50 of the Companies Act
Article 546.b of the Companies Act
AI generated
VSK sklep Cpg 30/2010
Appeal dismissed: Court ruled minority shareholders cannot bypass board approval to appoint a special auditor.
VSRS Sklep III Ips 16/2023
Supreme Court dismisses appeal withdrawal case, ruling parties bear their own costs when no legal provision mandates otherwise.
VSL Sklep I Cpg 633/2020
Appeal partially allowed; lower court violated procedural rights regarding special auditor appointment and third-party participation.
VSL Sklep I Cpg 225/2025
Court partially allows appointment of special auditor for specific company transactions due to suspected misconduct.
Sklep X Ips 337/2010
Appeal dismissed as no important legal issue existed since the tax law provision was clear and self-explanatory.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja: Ali je sodišče v postopku po 546.b členu ZGD-1 v primeru, da udeleženci zahtevajo izvedbo naroka zaradi izvedbe dokaza - zaslišanje zakonitega zastopnika oz. zaslišanje prič, s katerim udeleženci dokazujejo relevantno dejansko stanje, dolžno izvesti narok?

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je sodišče v postopku po 546.b členu ZGD-1 v primeru, da udeleženci zahtevajo izvedbo naroka zaradi izvedbe dokaza - zaslišanje zakonitega zastopnika oz. zaslišanje prič, s katerim udeleženci dokazujejo relevantno dejansko stanje, dolžno izvesti narok.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišči druge in prve stopnje sta v delu, ki je relevanten za odločanje o predlogu za dopustitev revizije, ugodili zahtevi za imenovanje posebnega revizorja v smislu drugega odstavka 546.b člena Zakona o gospodarskih družbah (ZGD-1) glede preverjanja poslov med povezanimi osebami.

2. Zoper sklep sodišča druge stopnje vlaga nasprotni udeleženec predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Vrhovno sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) v zvezi s 37. členom Zakona o nepravdnem postopku in 50. členom ZGD-1 glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato v tem obsegu dopustilo.

4. Sklep je bil sprejet soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).