Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL Sklep IV Cp 791/2022 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2022:IV.CP.791.2022 AI generated

Appeals dismissed because appellants withdrew their complaints after the first-instance ruling was vacated.

Case Number VSL Sklep IV Cp 791/2022
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court dismissed the appeals because the appellants explicitly withdrew their complaints upon the court's request. The underlying dispute involved a temporary contact schedule between a father and daughter, which was previously vacated by the first-instance court due to a protective order. The higher court ruled that since the parties no longer pursued the original appeal, the complaints were legally withdrawn and thus dismissed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku, 334. člen: When appellants withdraw their complaints after the appellate court requests their stance, the appeals are deemed withdrawn and the proceedings conclude without a substantive ruling on the merits.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of appeal appellant's withdrawal procedural dismissal contact schedule protective order vacated ruling appellate procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
334. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku
AI generated
VSM Sklep III Cp 706/2025
Appeal dismissed; court extends supervised contact every two weeks citing least restrictive measure principle.
VSL Sklep IV Cp 1213/2021
Appeal court modified visitation schedule for 10-year-old child, prioritizing long-term development over child's specific wishes.
VSM Sklep III Cp 794/2019
Appeal dismissed; temporary order denied as no serious child endangerment proven by applicant.
VSL Sklep IV Cp 1981/2018
Appeal partially allowed; contact supervision required due to proven physical and psychological abuse.
VSRS Sklep II DoR 271/2018
Supreme Court dismisses review application regarding supervised visitation orders and procedural delays in custody cases.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I. Ugotovi se, da sta pritožbi umaknjeni.

II. Odločitev o stroških pritožbenega postopka se pridrži za končno odločbo

[JEDRO]

Po pozivu pritožbenega sodišča udeležencema, ali glede na navedeno odločitev vztrajata pri pritožbi zoper izpodbijani sklep, sta sporočila, da pri pritožbah ne vztrajata. Zato je pritožbeno sodišče odločilo, da sta pritožbi umaknjeni.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je z izpodbijanim sklepom (z dne 14. 3. 2022) odločilo, da se stiki med očetom in hčerjo udeležencev začasno izvajajo vsako sredo med 15. in 16. uro v navzočnosti strokovne delavke CSD.

2. Udeleženca sta zoper navedeni sklep vložila pritožbi.

3. S sklepom z dne 21. 4. 2022 je sodišče postopek zavarovanja z začasno odredbo ustavilo in sklep z dne 14. 3. 2022 razveljavilo.

4. Po pozivu pritožbenega sodišča udeležencema, ali glede na navedeno odločitev vztrajata pri pritožbi zoper izpodbijani sklep, sta sporočila, da pri pritožbah ne vztrajata.

5. Ker sodišče druge stopnje o pritožbah še ni odločilo, je odločilo, kot izhaja iz izreka tega sklepa (drugi odstavek 334. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku).

6. O stroških pritožbenega postopka bo odločeno s končno odločbo.