Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL Sklep I Cp 147/2022 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2022:I.CP.147.2022 AI generated

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn before ruling; procedural termination appeal withdrawn per ZPP Art. 334(2).

Case Number VSL Sklep I Cp 147/2022
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appeal court declared the appeal withdrawn because the appellant withdrew it on March 21, 2022, prior to the court's decision. The underlying case involved a procedural termination order issued by the district court on November 19, 2021, regarding a related dispute. The court ruled in accordance with Article 334(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, noting that the withdrawal occurred before any judgment was rendered.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) 2. odst. 334. člen: If an appeal is withdrawn before the appellate court renders a decision, the appeal is deemed withdrawn and the court must declare it so.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural termination withdrawal of appeal Code of Civil Procedure appellate procedure procedural economy

Cited Legislation

AI generated
2. odst. 334. člen ZPP
AI generated
VSL Sklep II Cp 1925/2021
Appeal court rejects stay of proceedings as property title acquisition is not a preliminary issue for execution case.
VSL Sklep II Cp 647/2022
Appeal dismissed; court held partition decree does not create prior issue for exclusive ownership claim.
VSL sklep I Cp 426/2011
Appeal granted; court held fact-finding is not a preliminary issue warranting suspension under ZPP. Appeal granted; court held fact-finding is not a preliminary issue warranting suspension under ZPP.
VSM Sklep I Cp 847/2022
Appeal dismissed; court continues proceedings against first and third defendants despite constitutional suspension affecting only Bank of Slovenia.
VSL Sklep III Cp 1650/2024
Appeal dismissed; court upheld jurisdiction ruling as reissuing identical order is futile and economically wasteful.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se, da je pritožba zoper sklep Okrajnega sodišča v Ljubljani, opr. št. II P 668/2021 z dne 19. 11. 2021 umaknjena.

[JEDRO]

Predno je pritožbeno sodišče odločalo o pritožbi tožeče stranke zoper sklep o prekinitvi postopka, je 21. 3. 2022 prejelo umik pritožbe, zato je skladno z določilom drugega odstavka 334. člena ZPP, ugotovilo, da je pritožba umaknjena.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. V pravdni zadevi Okrajnega sodišča v Ljubljani pod opr. št. II P 668/2021 je sodišče 19. 11. 2021 izdalo sklep o prekinitvi pravdnega postopka do pravnomočne odločitve v zadevi, ki poteka pred Okrožnim sodiščem v Ljubljani pod opr. št. II P 306/2021. Predno je pritožbeno sodišče odločalo o pritožbi tožeče stranke zoper sklep o prekinitvi postopka, je 21. 3. 2022 prejelo umik pritožbe, zato je skladno z določilom drugega odstavka 334. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju: ZPP) odločilo, kot sledi iz izreka tega sklepa.

2. Izrek o stroških postopka je odpadel, ker sta se pravdni stranki v sodni poravnavi, ki sta jo sklenili pred Okrožnim sodiščem v Ljubljani, pod opr. št. V N 1426/2021 dne 14. 3. 2022 dogovorili, da vsaka stranka nosi svoje stroške postopka sama.

3. O umiku tožbe bo odločalo sodišče prve stopnje.