Legislator Case Law & Legislation
VSRS Sklep II DoR 108/2022 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2022:II.DOR.108.2022 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal permission request due to failure to pay court fees within the deadline.

Case Number VSRS Sklep II DoR 108/2022
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia dismissed the applicant's request for permission to appeal because the required court fee was not paid. The applicant failed to pay the fee within the deadline set by the court after an initial summons, and no conditions for exemption, deferral, or installment payments were met. Consequently, the request for permission to appeal was deemed withdrawn under the relevant procedural law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

ZPP 105.a odst. 1 in 3: Failure to pay the court fee within the prescribed period, without meeting conditions for exemption or deferral, results in the withdrawal of the request for permission to appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
court fee payment withdrawal of request permission to appeal procedural deadline ZPP 105.a

Cited Legislation

AI generated
105.a paragraph 1 of the Act on Civil Procedure
105.a paragraph 3 of the Act on Civil Procedure

Cited Case Law

AI generated
District Court of Maribor II P 296/2020
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se, da je predlog umaknjen.

[JEDRO]

Ugotovi se, da je predlog umaknjen.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Predlagatelj ob vložitvi predloga za dopustitev revizije ni plačal sodne takse, ki mora biti plačana po predpisih o sodnih taksah. Zato ga je Vrhovno sodišče z nalogom za plačilo sodne takse pozvalo k njenemu plačilu in mu določilo rok za plačilo (drugi odstavek 105.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku - v nadaljevanju ZPP).

2. Predlagatelj ni plačal dolžne sodne takse niti v roku, ki mu ga je določilo Vrhovno sodišče. Ker tudi niso podani pogoji za oprostitev 1 , odlog ali obročno plačilo sodnih taks, se šteje, da je predlog za dopustitev revizije umaknil (tretji odstavek 105.a člena ZPP).

1 Predlog za oprostitev plačila sodne takse je bil zavržen s sklepom Okrožnega sodišča v Mariboru II P 296/2020 z dne 3. 5. 2022.