Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep VIII DoR 57/2022-5 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2022:VIII.DOR.57.2022.5 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses review application as statutory conditions for Article 367a ZPP are not met.

Case Number VSRS Sklep VIII DoR 57/2022-5
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request for permission to appeal regarding the application of Articles 80, 81, and 82 of the Act on Occupational Safety and Health. The applicant argued that the lower courts failed to correctly apply these provisions concerning work incapacity, but the Supreme Court found the statutory prerequisites for a review application under Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act were not satisfied. Consequently, the request was dismissed pursuant to Article 367c of the Civil Procedure Act, confirming the finality of the lower court's decision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act; Article 367c of the Civil Procedure Act: A review application is inadmissible if the specific conditions for invoking Article 367a are not met, thereby upholding the finality of the lower court's judgment.

Keywords

AI generated
review application Civil Procedure Act work incapacity occupational safety finality of judgment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 367c of the Civil Procedure Act
Articles 80, 81, and 82 of the Act on Occupational Safety and Health
AI generated
VDSS sodba Psp 25/2014
Appeal dismissed; employee not entitled to sick leave as medical evidence showed capacity to work.
VDSS Sodba Psp 217/2021
Appeal dismissed; court upheld labor court ruling on worker's capacity for receptionist role post-injury.
VDSS sodba Psp 489/2014
Appeal dismissed; employer's duty to organize work within disability limits overrides need for site inspection.
VDSS Sklep Psp 27/2017
Appeal allowed; first instance court violated procedural rights by failing to interview the treating psychiatrist before obtaining the expert opinion.
VDSS sklep Psp 108/2013
Appeal allowed: Article 244 POZZ limits doctors' scope but does not restrict court's power to determine disability beyond 30 days.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Predlog se zavrne.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je zavrnilo tožnikov zahtevek na odpravo odločb toženca z dne 4. 12. 2019 in z dne 15. 1. 2020 ter na ugotovitev, da je bil tožnik tudi od 11. 11. 2019 dalje zaradi bolezni začasno nezmožen za delo polni delovni čas, ki še traja.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo tožnika zavrnilo in potrdilo sodbo sodišča prve stopnje.

3. Zoper pravnomočno sodbo sodišča druge stopnje je tožnik vložil predlog za dopustitev revizije glede vprašanja, ali je sodišče pravilno uporabilo 80., 81. in 82. člen ZZVZZ.

4. Predlog ni utemeljen.

5. Vrhovno sodišče ugotavlja, da pogoji iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena ZPP niso izpolnjeni, zato je na podlagi drugega odstavka 367.c člena ZPP zavrnilo predlog za dopustitev revizije.

6. Odločitev je bila sprejeta soglasno v senatu, navedenem v uvodu tega sklepa.