Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep II DoR 617/2021 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2022:II.DOR.617.2021 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal request for review due to failure to meet statutory grounds under ZPP Art. 367a.

Case Number VSRS Sklep II DoR 617/2021
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request for permission to appeal regarding a claim for damages from the deletion of a permanent residence registration. The applicant argued that the lower court deviated from established practice by excluding medical expert testimony and witness testimony. The court found the request ungrounded because the applicant failed to satisfy the specific conditions required for granting a review under the relevant procedural law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 367a ZPP; Art. 367.c ZPP: A request for permission to appeal is inadmissible if the applicant fails to demonstrate that the lower court's decision involves a violation of law or a significant deviation from established judicial practice.

Keywords

AI generated
permission to appeal review of judgment ZPP Article 367a deviation from practice medical expert opinion witness testimony permanent residence deletion

Cited Legislation

AI generated
367.a ZPP
367.c ZPP
324 ZPP
AI generated
VSL Sodba II Cp 1403/2021
Appeal dismissed; erasure from civil registry caused no loss of income, so administrative compensation was sufficient.
VSL Sodba II Cp 45/2021
Appeal dismissed; plaintiff failed to prove additional damages beyond statutory compensation for registry deletion.
VSM sodba I Cp 1791/2008
Court rejects appeal against liability for icy steps under strict liability for dangerous things.
VDSS Sodba Pdp 143/2018
Court dismisses appeal in work injury case, reducing employer liability for employee's contributory negligence.
VSM sodba I Cp 1287/2014
Appeal dismissed; court upheld liability for sports injury due to failure to clean floor despite witness testimony.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Predlog se zavrne.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je zavrnilo tožbeni zahtevek, s katerim je tožnik zahteval plačilo 61.857,92 EUR z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi kot odškodnino zaradi izbrisa iz registra stalnega prebivalstva. Odločilo je še o pravdnih stroških.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je zavrnilo pritožbo tožeče stranke in potrdilo sodbo sodišča prve stopnje.

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje je tožnik vložil predlog za dopustitev revizije glede „temelja in višine nastale škode, to je glede postavitve izvedenca medicinske stroke zaradi dokazovanja nepremoženjske škode in tudi glede zaslišanja predlagane priče A. A. (tožnikove žene)“. Zatrjuje odstop od sodne prakse Vrhovnega sodišča.

4. Predlog ni utemeljen.

5. Ker niso izpolnjeni pogoji, ki jih za dopustitev revizije določa prvi odstavek 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju ZPP), je Vrhovno sodišče zavrnilo predlog v skladu z drugim odstavkom 367.c člena ZPP.

6. Vrhovno sodišče je odločalo v senatu, navedenem v uvodu sklepa. Odločbo je sprejelo soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).