Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep II DoR 2/2022 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2022:II.DOR.2.2022 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal request for leave of appeal regarding enforcement judgment based on file status.

Case Number VSRS Sklep II DoR 2/2022
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia rejected the defendant's request for leave to appeal the first-instance judgment. The lower court upheld an enforcement order requiring the defendant to pay 3,318.12 EUR plus interest to the plaintiff. The defendant argued that the first instance court erred by issuing a judgment based solely on the file status without meeting statutory conditions under Article 282 of the Civil Procedure Act. The Supreme Court found the request unfounded because the conditions for granting leave of appeal under Article 367.a of the Civil Procedure Act were not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 282 of the Civil Procedure Act; Article 367.a and 367.c of the Civil Procedure Act: The Supreme Court may not grant leave of appeal if the conditions for such leave are not fulfilled, thereby dismissing the request for leave to appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
leave of appeal file status judgment enforcement proceedings Civil Procedure Act supreme court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 282 of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 367.a of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 367.c of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 8 of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 339 of the Civil Procedure Act
AI generated
VSL sodba II Cpg 1770/2015
Appeal dismissed; court upheld summary judgment where defendant failed to respond to amended complaint in small claims.
VSL sodba II Cp 2019/2014
Appeal dismissed; appeal reasons limited despite inadequate instruction on appeal period and scope.
VSL Sodba I Cp 1801/2019
Appellant's appeal dismissed; joint heirs are solidarily liable for water debts incurred during inheritance period.
VSL Sodba I Cpg 641/2018
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first instance ruling on enforcement of retention money and interest claims.
VSL Sodba I Cpg 353/2017
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first instance judgment on unpaid car rental fees under Contract Law.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Predlog se zavrne.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je razsodilo, da sklep o izvršbi Okrajnega sodišča v Ljubljani VL 44731/2017 z dne 24. 5. 2017 ostane v veljavi, in da je toženec dolžan tožnici plačati 3.318,12 EUR z obrestmi, razvidnimi iz izreka sodbe. Odločilo je še o stroških postopka.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je toženčevo pritožbo zavrnilo in potrdilo sodbo sodišča prve stopnje.

3. Toženec v predlogu za dopustitev revizije meni, da sodišče prve stopnje ne bi smelo izdati sodbe na podlagi stanja spisa, ker za to niso bili podani pogoji po drugem odstavku 282. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju ZPP). Zatrjuje še kršitve razpravnega načela in 8. člena ZPP. Predlaga dopustitev revizije glede vprašanja, ali je sodišče druge stopnje pravilno uporabilo določbe ZPP o izdaji sodbe na podlagi stanja spisa po določbah 282. člena ZPP, in ali je kršilo določbo 8. točke drugega odstavka 339. člena ZPP (pravico do izjave toženca) v povezavi z določbami 7., 8. in 12. člena ZPP.

4. Predlog ni utemeljen.

5. Pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena ZPP niso podani, zato je Vrhovno sodišče toženčev predlog zavrnilo (drugi odstavek 367.c člena ZPP).

6. Vrhovno sodišče je odločalo v senatu, navedenem v uvodu sklepa. Odločbo je sprejelo soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).