Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep VIII DoR 46/2020-8 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2020:VIII.DOR.46.2020.8 AI generated

Labor contract dispute dismissed; Supreme Court rejects review request for employment agreement delivery.

Case Number VSRS Sklep VIII DoR 46/2020-8
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request for permission to appeal a final labor court decision. The first-instance court dismissed the claim that the employer must deliver an indefinite-term employment contract for the position of General Director's Advisor with ten salary grades. The appellate court upheld this ruling, and the Supreme Court found no grounds for review under the relevant procedural law. Consequently, the request was denied because the lower courts correctly applied the law without error.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o delovnih razmerjih; Zakon o postopku pri delovnih sporih: The Supreme Court rejects a review request when the lower courts have correctly applied the law and no specific statutory grounds for review exist.

Keywords

AI generated
labor contract delivery indefinite term employment review request rejection labor dispute procedure salary grade progression

Cited Legislation

AI generated
367.a člen ZPP
367.c člen ZPP
AI generated
VDSS Sodba Pdp 741/2019
Appeal dismissed; written employment contract request denied as it only covers non-existent contracts, not existing ones.
VDSS sodba Pdp 356/2015
Appeal dismissed; labor court lacks power to annul internal appointment acts or force employment contract.
VSRS Sklep VIII DoR 1/2017
Supreme Court confirms withdrawal of appeal request is valid before second instance ruling.
Sodba in sklep VIII Ips 229/2011
Supreme Court dismisses appeal in labor dispute where non-property right to work claim requires leave, not automatic review. Appeal rejected as non-property dispute and monetary claims insufficient for automatic review. Court held non-property labor disputes require leave, not automatic review, and monetary claims insufficient for automatic review.
VDSS Sodba Pdp 1033/2016
Appeal dismissed; court confirms employee rights based on actual work performed despite lack of formal title.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Predlog se zavrne.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je med drugim (v III. točki izreka) zavrglo tožbo v delu, da je toženka dolžna tožnici izročiti pogodbo o zaposlitvi za nedoločen čas za delovno mesto svetovalec generalnega direktorja I, z upoštevanimi desetimi plačnimi razredi napredovanj.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo tožnice zavrnilo in sklep o zavrženju tožbe v izpodbijanem delu potrdilo.

3. Zoper pravnomočno sodbo sodišča druge stopnje je tožnica vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije glede pravilnosti ravnanja sodišč, ki sta zavrgli tožbo glede izročitve pogodbe o zaposlitvi za delovno mesto svetovalec generalnega direktorja.

4. Predlog ni utemeljen.

5. Ker revizijsko sodišče ne ugotavlja razlogov za dopustitev revizije v skladu s 367.a členom ZPP, je predlog zavrnilo (drugi odstavek 367.c člena ZPP).

6. Vrhovno sodišče je odločalo v senatu, navedenem v uvodu sklepa. Odločitev je sprejelo soglasno.